Express Editorial: Weaponising an advocacy document to arrest an activist signals paranoia, not democratic power.
Evidence in the in the public domain points to Disha Ravi, a 22-year-old environmental activist, being just that - young and an activist. In an online interview, eight months ago, she talks, in sentences that end with a rising intonation, as if her sentences are questions, about causes ranging from climate change to feminism. Evidence in the public domain also suggests Delhi Police - which arrested Ravi in a case filed against unnamed persons for sedition and conspiracy over a “toolkit” tweeted by climate campaigner Greta Thunberg on the farmers’ protest on February 3 - has weaponised what is a typical advocacy document.
Naxalites
should lay down their arms and challenge the ruling class to abide by the
Constitution
And that the Centre, to whom Delhi Police answers, is ratcheting up rhetoric of a shadowy international conspiracy even as it insists, after 11 formal rounds of talks with farm union leaders, that it is willing to continue talking. Now, Delhi Police has secured Ravi’s custody on grounds that it needs to probe a link to a pro-Khalistan group, and to recover a deleted WhatsApp group with “vital information”. Of course, only an impartial probe, which accords Ravi all due protections of law, can determine innocence or establish guilt. But given the context of the indiscriminate sweep of FIRs in the January 26 aftermath and the bizarre over-reading of what is a common advocacy tool, the arrest of the 22-year-old activist raises grave worries.
Ever since the farm protests began, the government has
sought to demonise the protesters or to undermine their agency by looking over
their shoulder - in the case of farmers from Punjab, the Khalistan spectre
comes in handy. The fact is that the state’s tryst with terror in the decade of
the 1980s has left a bitter residue in the form of a hardliner fringe, more NRI
than not. It may also be, as happens in large movements, that this fringe is
riding the ongoing mobilisation. But the impression is inescapable that the
government is giving it undue attention. In the name of unravelling a grand
foreign plot, it seems to be harnessing all its formidable power and energies
to go after, and to be seen to go after activists, instead of addressing the
central issue - the protesters’ fears and anxieties about the laws in question.
In the process, it is sending out a chilling message, especially to the
country’s young - you can speak out and talk back to your government at your
own peril.
Surely India’s democracy cannot be so thin-skinned about
international interface, so paranoid, ’70s-style, about the “foreign hand”. In
an open democracy, the power of a government lies not in creating an obedient
and pliant citizenry by criminalising the protester, but in extending and
enlivening the public sphere. The wise men and women of the government need to
ask: When there is a democratic protest against a law passed by Parliament, who
draws the red lines, where, and at what cost?
Rihanna and Greta prompt an MEA outburst — and a
hashtag firestorm
SIMRAN
JEET SINGH: The Farmers' Protests Are a Turning Point for India's Democracy
Avay Shukla - ARE THE FARMERS MAKING DELHI IRRELEVANT
?
Reflections of an American living in India...
Discussion
on Indian Agriculture and the ongoing Kisan agitation
Navsharan
Singh: A million reasons to march
Jairus
Banaji on the Indian corporate strategy of subordinating farm households and
family labor
STATE OF
RURAL AND AGRARIAN INDIA REPORT 2020. By the Network of Rural and Agrarian
Studies
Jairus Banaji on the Indian corporatist strategy of
subordinating farm households and family labor
Navsharan Singh: A million reasons to march
Discussion on Indian Agriculture and the ongoing Kisan
agitation
Amit Bhaduri: Faces in mirror held up by farmers’
protest
Deb Mukharji - A Himalayan lesson, and about time
Ramachandra Guha: Gandhi
said RSS was ‘communal with a totalitarian outlook’ – and that’s still true
Noam Chomsky: Internationalism or Extinction (Universalizing Resistance)
Can Capitalism and Democracy Coexist?
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
Giulio Regeni murder: Egypt rejects naming of its
agents as suspects
Book Review: 'Secrecy World' by Jake Bernstein
Supreme Court lays emphasis on protecting personal
liberty
Avay Shukla: Acts Of God And
Follies Of Man
Colin Gonsalves: Refusal of bail to Sudha Bharadwaj is
based on inadmissible evidence
Samjhauta Express blast case
verdict: ‘Who will answer for death of my five children?’
Jailed and Harassed Former
IGP Darapuri, 76, Shares His Ordeal
Prem Shankar Jha: The Shadow
of Haren Pandya’s Case Lies Long Over Justice Arun Mishra
‘This episode is going to haunt SC in years to come’: Justice AP Shah on
CJI sexual harassment case
