Bharat Bhushan: A madcap bail order and rumours of UP poll deferral
A suggestion by the Allahabad High Court that elections in Uttar Pradesh should be postponed has given life to rumours that this may be a real possibility. No less than the BJP’s maverick Rajya Sabha MP, Subramanian Swamy, considered close to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has tweeted, “Don’t be surprised by a Lockdown for Omicron and postponement of UP elections to September under President’s Rule in UP. What could not be directly done earlier this year can be then done indirectly early next year.”
Is it pure coincidence
that Swamy’s tweet came a day after the Allahabad High Court judge’s observations? Is it
equally coincidental that on the same day the Election Commission announced its
visit to the state?
Allahabad High Court judge, Shekhar Kumar Yadav,
advocated postponement of state elections in the bail order of an alleged
gangster charged under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities
(Prevention) Act that had nothing to do with the upcoming elections. He ordered
that copies of his order be sent to the Election Commissioner and to the
Centre. He also appealed directly to Prime Minister Narendra
Modi to consider postponement. He must be aware that his obiter dicta
(opinions expressed in a judgement which have nothing to do with the legal case
being adjudicated) are not binding on anyone. Why then did he make these
pronouncements?
Justice Yadav is a
serial offender when it comes to issuing obiter dicta. In September, in another
bail order, he said that cow-protection should be made a “fundamental right of
Hindus”. He also erroneously observed that, “scientists believe that the cow is
the only animal which takes in oxygen and gives off oxygen,” and suggested that
“Parliament should bring a law to make the cow a national animal.” He explained
that Indians traditionally offered ghee made from cow’s milk to the yajna fire
as, “this gives special energy to the rays of the sun, which ultimately causes
rain.”
The former Chief
Justice of Allahabad High Court, Justice Govind Mathur had reminded Justice
Yadav, that “The court is not a platform for imposing your own
ideas/philosophies, and the judge is not supposed to touch the merits of the
case in bail rulings.” But to no effect. In a recent bail order of a man
accused of making obscene remarks against Lord Ram and Krishna on Facebook,
Justice Yadav wanted Parliament to enact a law giving legal heritage status to
Ram and Krishna, the Ramayana, Bhagwad Gita and their putative authors Valmiki
and Ved Vyas
Is it just the
arrogance of office which encourages Justice Yadav to hold forth or is he using
his position to consciously push a Hindutva agenda? Many judges have made
ridiculous and even unconstitutional observations – ranging from the
fertility-inducing properties of peacocks’ tears (Justice Mahesh Chandra Sharma
of Rajasthan High Court) to how India should have been declared a Hindu nation
in 1947 (Justice Sudip Ranjan Sen of Meghalaya High Court). Justice Yadav’s
lapse of judgement then is not so much in issuing obiter dicta but in his
desire to propagate his political views.
Justice Yadav makes no
secret of his Hindutva politics. In fact, he is quite open about sharing public
platforms with RSS functionaries. In August this year, he was the Chief Guest
at a Hindi promotion event organised by the Allahabad Bar Association where the
keynote speaker was RSS Prant Pracharak (District Propaganda Chief) Murari
Tripathi. In the same month, he attended a meeting at the Vishwa Hindu Parishad
headquarters at Kesar Bhavan in the city as Chief Guest of the RSS front
organisation, Bharat Vikas Parishad, along with BJP MP
from Phulpur, Kesari Devi Patel. Several VHP functionaries were in attendance.
So when he suggested
that the UP election should be postponed due to Covid-19 fears, was he voicing
a public concern or was he lending legal gravitas to concerns from the fringe
Right? Could it be that Hindutva forces would like the polls postponed because
they foresee a drubbing in the UP assembly elections? Despite a worse pandemic
situation prevailing then, these groups did not call for deferring polling for
the West Bengal, Assam, Tamil Nadu and Kerala elections or for local body
elections in UP and Telangana. Indeed, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed a
public interest litigation challenging the holding of panchayat elections in
the midst of the pandemic saying Covid-protocol was being followed by the
government.
There are some
eye-openers in the speculations floating around about how a postponement of
elections in UP might help the BJP. There
is conjecture that if UP polls are deferred (along with the other states where
elections are scheduled), then Yogi
Adityanath could be finished as a contender within the BJP –
both for chief ministership of UP or as a national alternative to Prime
Minister Modi. President’s Rule would have to be imposed in the state and for
six months, Adityanath would not be a member of the legislature. He is also
unlikely to be accommodated at the Centre.
It is possible, it is
suggested, that six months later, in August- September, Prime Minister Modi
would call for “one nation, one poll”, dissolve Parliament and state
governments where the BJP is in power to hold national elections together with
state elections. This would mean simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha and state
elections for UP, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Goa, Manipur, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Tripura, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and the Union Territory of Jammu and
Kashmir.
The advantage would be
that by September next year, voters may have forgotten about the farmers’
agitation, Adityanath would be out of the reckoning, Ajay Misra Teni’s son
would have been released for ‘lack of evidence’ and opportunities for yet more
“inaugurations” in the election going states to showcase the BJP’s commitment
to development. The UP election could then be won by Prime Minister Modi along
with his re-election bid for a third term.
But will the BJP or
Prime Minister Modi take such a gamble? A postponement now would underline the
weakness of the regime and will be bad for Brand Modi.
Bharat
Bhushan - 'Entire political science' lesson: Peoples' power trumps people in
power
Bharat
Bhushan - Save the Election Commission: Common electoral roll can wait
Bharat
Bhushan: Frontier of warfare? Wrong to securitise civil society discourse
Bharat
Bhushan: Burden of bigotry may break Indian democracy's back
YANN PHILIPPIN - Sale of French Rafale jet
fighters to India: how a state scandal was buried
Anne
Michel and Simon Piel - Rafale case: Fresh moves towards a corruption
investigation
Bharat
Bhushan - Scania Scandal: Need to step up to the challenge
Bharat
Bhushan - Pegasus impact: Loss to Indian Republic and government is much
greater
Samar
Halarnkar: The lights begin to wink out in India’s democracy
