Eric Toussaint: Concerning the founding of the Bretton Woods’ Institutions
Series: 1944-2019, 75 years of interference
from the World Bank and the IMF (Part 1)
Part 2 The WB assists those in power in a witch-hunting context
see also
Capitalism is destroying the Earth. We need a new human right for future generations
In 2019, the World
Bank (WB) and the IMF will be 75 years old. These two international financial
institutions (IFI), founded in 1944, are dominated by the USA and a few allied
major powers who work to generalize policies that run counter the interests of
the world’s populations.The WB and the IMF have systematically made loans to States as a means of
influencing their policies. Foreign indebtedness has been and continues to be
used as an instrument for subordinating the borrowers. Since their creation,
the IMF and the WB have violated international pacts on human rights and have
no qualms about supporting dictatorships.
A new form of
decolonization is urgently required to get out of the predicament in which the
IFI and their main shareholders have entrapped the world in general. New
international institutions must be established. This new series of articles by
Éric Toussaint retraces the development of the World Bank and the IMF since
they were founded in 1944. The articles are taken from the book The World Bank:
a never-ending coup d’état. The hidden agenda of the Washington Consensus,
Mumbai: Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, 2007, or The World Bank : A
critical Primer Pluto, 2007.
In the beginning [1]
It was in 1941, the
year the United States entered the Second World War, that discussions were
initiated concerning the international institutions to be set up once this
major conflict was over.
In May 1942, Harry White, chief international economist at the U.S. Treasury, presented Franklin Roosevelt with a blueprint entitled “Plan for a United and Associated Nations Stabilization Fund and a Bank for Reconstruction and Development of the United Nations”. One of its objectives was to convince the allied nations currently at war with the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, Japan) that once peace was established, certain systems would need to be adopted to prevent the world economy entering a depression similar to that of the 1930’s.
In May 1942, Harry White, chief international economist at the U.S. Treasury, presented Franklin Roosevelt with a blueprint entitled “Plan for a United and Associated Nations Stabilization Fund and a Bank for Reconstruction and Development of the United Nations”. One of its objectives was to convince the allied nations currently at war with the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, Japan) that once peace was established, certain systems would need to be adopted to prevent the world economy entering a depression similar to that of the 1930’s.
Between 1941 and July
1944, when the Bretton Woods Conference assembled, several of the proposals
contained in the initial plan were abandoned. But one of them came to fruition:
the creation of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and
the IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development), better known
as the World Bank.
To fully understand
the roles attributed to these two institutions, we must go back to the late
1920s and the 1930s. The severe economic depression that gripped the United
States during this period had a profound effect on world capitalism in general.
One of the consequences was that in 1931 Germany stopped repayment of its war
debt to France, Belgium, Italy and Great Britain. In a domino effect, these
countries stopped repayment of their external debt to the United States [2].
As for the United States, it drastically reduced capital exports in 1928 and
even more so in 1931 [3]. At the same time, it
cut down on imports. The result was that the flow of dollars from the United
States to the rest of the world dried up, and countries with debts to the
world’s leading power did not have the dollars to pay it back. Nor did they
have the dollars they needed to buy North American products. The machinery of
world capitalism was grinding to a halt. Competitive devaluations ensued as
each country attempted to win market share at
the expense of the others. The developed capitalist world was caught in a
downward spiral.
In 1932 John Maynard
Keynes made this ironic remark about the attitude of the United States: “The
rest of the world owes them money. They will not take payment in goods; they
will not take it in bonds; they have already all the gold there is. The puzzle
which they have set to the rest of the world admits logically of only one
solution, namely, that some way must be found of doing without their exports” [4].
One of the conclusions
drawn by the United States government under Franklin Roosevelt (U.S. President
from 1933 to 1945), was that a great creditor nation must make currency
available to debtor countries to be used for repayment of their debt. Another,
bolder conclusion was that in certain cases, it is preferable to offer
donations instead of loans if a State wants its exporting industries to gain
maximum and lasting profit.
This question will be dealt with in a following article devoted to the Marshall Plan for
the reconstruction of Europe (1948-1951).
Let us take a closer
look at the Thirties before going on to the creation of the Bretton Woods
institutions during the Second World War... read more:
http://www.cadtm.org/Concerning-the-founding-of-the-Bretton-Woods-InstitutionsPart 2 The WB assists those in power in a witch-hunting context
Part 3 Early
conflicts between the UN and the World Bank/IMF tandem
Part 4 SUNFED versus World Bank
Part 5 Why the Marshall Plan ?
Part 6 The cancellation of German debt in 1953 versus the attitude to the Third World and Greece
Part 7 Domination of the United States on the World Bank
Part 8 World Bank and IMF support to dictatorships
Part 9 The World Bank and the Philippines
Part 10 The World Bank’s support of the dictatorship in Turkey (1980-1983)
Part 11 The World Bank and the IMF in Indonesia: an emblematic interference
Part 12 Theoretical lies of the World Bank
Part 13 As tensions increase with North Korea, the South Korean miracle is exposed
Part 4 SUNFED versus World Bank
Part 5 Why the Marshall Plan ?
Part 6 The cancellation of German debt in 1953 versus the attitude to the Third World and Greece
Part 7 Domination of the United States on the World Bank
Part 8 World Bank and IMF support to dictatorships
Part 9 The World Bank and the Philippines
Part 10 The World Bank’s support of the dictatorship in Turkey (1980-1983)
Part 11 The World Bank and the IMF in Indonesia: an emblematic interference
Part 12 Theoretical lies of the World Bank
Part 13 As tensions increase with North Korea, the South Korean miracle is exposed
see also