2002 Gujarat riots: HC orders panel to give suspended IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt access to records
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court today directed the G T Nanavati Inquiry Commission, probing the 2002 post-Godhra riots, to give suspended IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt access to all intelligence documents pertaining to the riots by Friday. A High Court bench, comprising Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala, passed an order directing the Commission to let Bhatt inspect the documents, irrespective of whether they are classified or not.
The High Court also directed the Commission to provide Bhat access to those documents by Friday. Earlier, in 2012, Bhatt and the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) had filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the High Court seeking access to Godhra riot-related intelligence records from Gujarat government. The PIL was moved after Gujarat government refused to provide Bhatt with the documents.
"Even after a directive was issued by the High Court during October 2012, my client was not allowed to see many crucial documents by the (Gujarat) government. Later, during 2013, we approached the High Court, once again, to direct the Nanavati Commission to give access to those intelligence documents submitted by Gujarat government," Sanjeev Bhatt's counsel Anand Yagnik said.
"When we approached the Commission, it refused Bhatt from accessing these documents, claiming that they are of a classified nature," Yagnik had said in the court.http://www.firstpost.com/india/2002-guj-riots-hc-orders-panel-to-give-sanjeev-bhatt-access-to-records-1573469.html
The High Court also directed the Commission to provide Bhat access to those documents by Friday. Earlier, in 2012, Bhatt and the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) had filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the High Court seeking access to Godhra riot-related intelligence records from Gujarat government. The PIL was moved after Gujarat government refused to provide Bhatt with the documents.
"Even after a directive was issued by the High Court during October 2012, my client was not allowed to see many crucial documents by the (Gujarat) government. Later, during 2013, we approached the High Court, once again, to direct the Nanavati Commission to give access to those intelligence documents submitted by Gujarat government," Sanjeev Bhatt's counsel Anand Yagnik said.
"When we approached the Commission, it refused Bhatt from accessing these documents, claiming that they are of a classified nature," Yagnik had said in the court.http://www.firstpost.com/india/2002-guj-riots-hc-orders-panel-to-give-sanjeev-bhatt-access-to-records-1573469.html
see also
Subhash Gatade - Thinking About Adam Ajmeris' in Saffron Times
A serving Indian police officer writes about encounter killings
Bharat Bhushan - The Vanzara bomb has a long fuse for Modi
Naroda Patiya verdict: Aides face the music, Modi remains ‘righteous’: by Kingshuk Nag
CBI Summons IB Special Director Rajinder Kumar In Ishrat Jahan Encounter Case // CBI seeks to declare Gujarat cop a proclaimed offender
Team Modi and free speech: Republishing "9 Myth Busters Of Gujarat 2002 Riots" by Shehzad Poonawalla
A serving Indian police officer writes about encounter killings
Bharat Bhushan - The Vanzara bomb has a long fuse for Modi
Naroda Patiya verdict: Aides face the music, Modi remains ‘righteous’: by Kingshuk Nag
CBI Summons IB Special Director Rajinder Kumar In Ishrat Jahan Encounter Case // CBI seeks to declare Gujarat cop a proclaimed offender
Team Modi and free speech: Republishing "9 Myth Busters Of Gujarat 2002 Riots" by Shehzad Poonawalla
Very short list of examples of rule of law in India
The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi
The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi
Ulema now demand expulsion of Taslima Nasrin
Terrifying implications of the Staines judgement
Murder of TP Chandrasekharan 2012
Terrifying implications of the Staines judgement
Murder of TP Chandrasekharan 2012