British universities to introduce sex apartheid? Multiculturalism & Islamism in insane alliance
Unlimited cultural relativism: in the name of respect for religious beliefs, Universities UK issued guidelines advocating for gender apartheid, which they say is not discriminatory.
Universities UK, a “representative” body of UK Universities, has issued guidelines on external speakers saying that the segregation of the sexes at universities is not discriminatory as long as both men and women are segregated side by side rather than women being made to sit in the back! The guidance states:
UK: Sex apartheid not discriminatory?Source: http://freethoughtblogs.com/maryamnamazie/2013/11/23/sex-apartheid-not-discriminatory/
by Maryam Namazie
Universities UK, a “representative” body of UK Universities, has issued guidelines on external speakers saying that the segregation of the sexes at universities is not discriminatory as long as both men and women are segregated side by side rather than women being made to sit in the back! The guidance states:
Assuming the
side-by-side segregated seating arrangement is adopted, there does not appear
to be any discrimination on gender grounds merely by imposing segregated
seating. Both men and women are being treated equally, as they are both being
segregated in the same way.
So racial apartheid
would have been non-discriminatory if white and black people had been
segregated in the same manner? In fact that is the very argument the apartheid
regime of South Africa used when faced with criticism:”separate but
equal.” The Universities UK guidance adds:
“Segregation in
the context of the facts outlined above would only be discriminatory on the
grounds of sex if it amounts to ‘less favourable treatment’ of either female or
male attendees.” … “It should therefore be borne in mind that [...] concerns to
accommodate the wishes or beliefs of those opposed to segregation should not
result in a religious group being prevented from having a debate in accordance
with its belief system.”
“Ultimately, if
imposing an unsegregated seating area in addition to the segregated areas
contravenes the genuinely-held religious beliefs of the group hosting the
event, or those of the speaker, the institution should be mindful to ensure
that the freedom of speech of the religious group or speaker is not curtailed
unlawfully.”
Clearly, this is not
about people’s belief systems. If it were so, Muslims would be unable to
ride buses, the underground, enter their workplaces via entrances used by both
men and women, eat in non-segregated restaurants… They wouldn’t even be able to
get to the segregated meeting room since men and women would be mingling freely
on the streets and halls right up to their entry into the segregated hall
kindly organised by Universities UK.
And what next?
Another set of guidelines asking unveiled women to veil so as not to “result in
a religious group being prevented from having a debate in accordance with its
belief system.” Maybe they can ask that niqabs be handed out to unchaste and
unveiled women before entry. More importantly, what about the women and
men, including Muslims, who don’t want to be segregated?
What Universities UK
conveniently forgets is that segregation of the sexes and the veil are highly
contested even amongst Muslims. By justifying segregation, they choose to side
with Islamists at the expense of women’s rights and equality. It doesn’t
take a genius to understand that segregation is never applied to those who are
considered equal but rather to separate the “superior” from the “inferior.”
Women are too “beguiling” to sit next to men; they will cause chaos and fitnah
and therefore must be segregated and veiled. Universities UK agrees.
The guidance must be rescinded immediately.
Woburn House
20 Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9HQ
The guidance must be rescinded immediately.
I suggest writing
and calling and exposing this lot until they do.
Here are their
details:
Tel: +44 (0)20 7419
4111
Email: info@universitiesuk.ac.uk
Website: www.universitiesuk.ac.uk
Twitter:
@UniversitiesUK
I would also suggest
that NO speaker or audience ever agree to enter a room that is segregated. We
should boycott universities that accept this guidance and the speakers that
agree to speak in such situations. How do you think racial apartheid
ended? When people refused to accept it and to submit. And this is how gender apartheid will end too. Not by appeasement and certainly
not by institutionalising misogyny. It will end when we insist: no more!