The Crises of Party Culture: by Yang Guang

NB: A pithy analysis of the impact of totalitarian rule by a Chinese intellectual. 
Yang Guang (given name Wu Jun), was born in Hubei Province in 1965 & graduated from Huhan University. From 1986 to 1989, he worked as a mathematics teacher before enrolling as a graduate student at Beijing Normal University. He soon lost his status as a student & was under investigation due to his involvement in student movements & the June 4th Incident. In 1990, he was sentenced to one year in prison for “anti-revolution propaganda”.. From 1991 to 2006 he worked in the private sector.. Since 2004, he has been a freelance writer, columnist & independent scholar of political sociology & modern Chinese history.

The crises of Party culture become clear with a single glance. The CPC is called the ruling party, yet it operates according to secret party rules: this is an identity crisis. Its formal ceremonies and slogans are like those of an extremist church, and it has long lost its utopian doctrine that stirred the passion of the people: this is an ideological crisis. It tells beautiful lies while accepting bribes and keeping mistresses: this is a moral crisis. The totalitarian system is in the process of collapsing, yet political reform is not in the foreseeable future: this is a political crisis. It has corrupted traditional values and also rejected universal values, rendering Party members and government officials at a spiritual loss: this is a crisis of values.

Party and culture are a bizarre pairing of imbalance and discord. In order to grasp its true meaning, one needs to understand the concept of party culture in the same way as one would understand “honor among thieves” (盗亦有道). That is to say, even the gangs who steal as a way of life also need to be “cultured”— to the point that they also occasionally need to “stress political awareness and integrity.” Every proper gang has its own flag, argot, code of brotherhood, rules, heritage, and “heroic” feats, to such an extent that even their hairstyles and the tattoos on their backs are all stylized and have hidden cultural connotations.

The godfather of a gang is usually not the one best at martial arts, nor the most wicked. He is certainly not the one with the ferocious, murderous look in his eyes, as he may appear in television shows. Rather, he is generally the person in the gang with moral authority and persuasiveness, who can represent the gang’s ideals. He is the one most able to make his underlings feel the gang’s raison d’etre, allowing them to have a clear conscience and feel that their work is not done in vain. Generally, he is none other than the healthy, energetic one with the demeanor of a great man. Take, for instance, Song Jiang in the Water Margin. Song was far more suited to be Chairman of the Party and Military Commission than Li Kui, Wu Song, and Li Chong. Regardless of the situation, “cultured” gangs are always more worthy of public trust than are thugs. A gang will usually take your money and not kill you, but thugs behave erratically and are hard to predict. Only with this in mind can we acknowledge that “Party culture” is also a meaningful concept, worthy of exploration...

CPC culture probably lies somewhere among organizational culture, bureaucratic culture, clique culture, wealth culture, mafia culture, and cult culture—or is some combination of those. First, the average Party member with neither power nor position has an extremely superficial relationship with the Party, and thus can only treat it as an organization. Those who want all of the special privileges and benefits that come from being members of the Party are likely to be disappointed: perks are set aside for only those who rise through the ranks. There are no shared values and benefits among the ordinary Party members and between ordinary members and senior cadres. The party culture baptism they have received is only at the superficial level of organizational culture. Should something happen to the CPC, in one night, 95 percent of the ordinary Party members would abandon ship.

Second, the bottom and middle tiers of the Party usually treat the Party as a mutual aid association for bureaucrats, and they may participate in some cliquish activities organized by factions within the Party. This is what officials do, because it is difficult for an isolated bureaucrat to have firm standing in official circles. For them, party culture is bureaucratic culture and clique culture. What party culture offers them is primarily a system of discourse and standards for handling things that are commonly used in the bureaucracy. These include how to handle official affairs, deal with the people, curry favor with their superiors, accept bribes, form factions, find a patron, and get promoted. These all involve skills, and there are baseline rules: one has to play the game nimbly, with high stakes and without stepping over the line. It is by no means easy and requires that one be “cultured.” This kind of culture has always existed throughout the world, but the CPC has brought it to new heights. Party cadres play bureaucrats so brilliantly that any one person taking office would bring luster on the entire family, and one position that offers opportunity for “grease” can attract hundreds of thousands of well-educated people competing for it...

Third, Party members at the highest levels view the Party mainly as a social club for the rich and powerful; a super-gang, a cult. They must, of course, serve as members of the Party and as government officials, but they operate completely differently from ordinary Party members and officials at the lower and middle ranks. Their main responsibilities are hobnobbing with the Party blue blood, socializing with the giants of industry and commerce, arranging and smoothing out various privileged relationships, and communicating with all power factions.

The CPC has long ceased being an underground, revolutionary party. Rather, it is the world’s biggest ruling party governing the world’s second-largest economy. But it has retained most of the organizational conventions of an underground party. It separates insiders from outsiders and puts factional rules over the laws of the state. It holds secret meetings and has its own jargon. The Politics and Legislative Affairs Committee and Central Commission for Discipline Inspection can replace the law with the Party, set up kangaroo courts, and browbeat the judiciary. At the highest level, the selecting officials for major positions, making major policy decisions, and convening major meetings all happen inside a black box. However rumors may fly, the Party will not operate in broad daylight. This is probably because the filth behind the scenes is so horrid that the Party needs to keep it out of view. It is clear that changing from an underground party into a ruling one is not easy, and turning gang culture into party culture is even less so. So, with pen in one hand and gun in the other, the Party earnestly gives itself praises even when it has done bad things. With any kind of political achievement, it would present itself as “great, brilliant, and correct” (伟光正), as Mao used to say about the Party, as if it were really true..

Facing so many crises, Party culture is sure to wither away. One can see indications of its accelerated decline in Hu Jintao and Bo Xilai, and in how the Party handles the Bo Xilai affair. Hu and Bo can be called outstanding representatives of Party culture, high-quality products cultivated and molded in the golden age of Party culture.. High-ranking party-state officials like Hu and Bo—with their demeanor, official and personal conduct, and governing style—would absolutely have no place in other parties, cultures, and systems. These two men—educated and cultivated by Party culture—can only be officials in the CPC, and can become such high-ranking officials only in a China that is ruled by the CPC. What country or party would allow an official in such a high position as Hu Jintao to do nothing, or someone ambitious like Bo Xilai to run amuck? Today, Hu treads on thin ice, and Bo, fallen from power, has been totally discredited. With a different political and cultural background, Hu and Bo—as long as they are not born villains—could have led happier, more meaning political lives.. Read more:

Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Goodbye Sadiq al-Azm, lone Syrian Marxist against the Assad regime