Hu Jintao’s visit highlights Hong Kong’s dystopian future

We’re fortunate in Hong Kong to be largely out-of-reach of the more Communist element of the People’s Republic.  While going to work in Beijing meant passing guards dressed in green military garb, the PLA is almost totally invisible in Hong Kong.  Here, people are free to criticize China, mourn those who died on June 4, 1989, question the death of Li Wangyang, and partially elect their representatives to District Councils and the Legislative Council.  There is a thriving civil society here, and it is inspiring to see it grow and evolve.
Hong Kong’s history and success – yes, intertwined with that of Britain’s – is something to be proud of. That’s why Hu Jintao’s visit to the territory this weekend to mark the 15th anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover is so depressingI can’t stress enough how proud I am to live in Hong Kong.  I’ve lived in several other cities in China, and enjoyed the experience immensely.  I spend much of my time in Mainland China and even run a business there.  But Mainland China doesn’t share my values the way Hong Kong does, and Hong Kong people do.
Nonetheless, it appears Hong Kong people are fighting a long battle that will be almost impossible to win.  At every turn, there is growing influence from Mainland China: millions of Mainland Chinese are pouring across the border each year, Beijing is pushing Hong Kong to adopt a “patriotic” curriculum for students, Mandarin is gaining in importance against centuries-old Cantonese, many believe self-censorship in the local media is on the rise, the SCMP has largely fallen into Mainland hands, and I could go on.  Each of these is a front in a war to maintain Hong Kong’s unique way of life, a war that sees Hong Kong badly outmatched by its northern neighbour and compatriot.
Is Hong Kong worth saving? The question is, is Hong Kong’s way of life worth saving?  Why shouldn’t it integrate further with the Mainland? Here’s why: freedom and hard work are valued here, far ahead of corruption and cronyism.  Yes, the latter two exist, but they don’t underpin society here the same way they do in Mainland China (for more on this, I highly recommend reading about the ICAC, an institution China badly needs).  I had a huge adjustment to make after four years in Mainland China, where my work only needed to be “good enough”. Here, perfection is expected.  Hong Kong is a small territory and in order for it to succeed as a global city, everyone needs to pull much more more than their own weight.  Hong Kong people realize this, and I’m proud to join in and do my part, too.
In addition, Hong Kong people are tremendously political; there are protests and rallies nearly every weekend.  This is a sign of a healthy and functioning civil society, something China sorely lacks.  Years in China taught me to be very careful about criticizing the government or country to Chinese friends or colleagues, but in Hong Kong there is no such concern.  Hong Kong people are able to look objectively at their own local and national governments and critique them, which is refreshing.
Hong Kong’s legal system gives each and every Hong Kong person proper protection, and ensures that things like food safety are properly regulated.  This is why Mainland people can be seen flocking to Hong Kong to stock up on things like baby powder.  Yes, there are some corrupt companies and people in Hong Kong, as there are everywhere, but a proper legal system ensures they are dealt with appropriately.  The city is plagued with other issues, such as pollution, a wealth gap, and soaring property market. However, a functioning free press allows people at all levels of society to confront the issues and try and find solutions, whereas discussing the most sensitive of social issues in China is verboten. Like democracy itself, this system is not perfect; but it’s much better than the alternative presented by Beijing.
Put simply, Hong Kong is ahead of China on the development curve.  In fact, as a Canadian, I often feel Hong Kong’s efficient bureaucracy, tax regime, work ethic and social structure are far ahead of my own country’s.  If anything, Hong Kong should be more heavily influencing the mainland, not vice versa. So, in my view, Hong Kong’s unique way of life should absolutely be preserved.  Many Mainland Chinese people – and foreigners – in China would like to see the Mainland move towards a more open and free society, so why restrict it in a place where that has largely already been achieved?
The dystopian future Therefore it saddens me to see business leaders and politicians who grew up in a sophisticated, international financial centre kowtow to Beijing’s Communist ruler of the day — but they must. It’s just a weird wrinkle of history. Those images sure don’t fill Hong Kong people with optimism.  They’re skittish because they – and all of us – see the looming threat on the horizon.  Hong Kong simply isn’t big enough to fight off the Mainland’s influence over the long term and on multiple fronts.  Only the Basic Law – which China agreed to and ensures the continuation of Hong Kong’s system until 2047 – is keeping things in order.
Nobody knows what China’s long-term plans are for Hong Kong, but it would be short-sighted to drastically change the status quo. Unlike “Brand China”, which is not highly regarded worldwide, Hong Kong is generally well respected.  As an international financial centre, Hong Kong has had more success than London or New York in recent years.  It is a jewel in China’s crown — but not one China built itself entirely, which makes those in Beijing uneasy. What saddened me most this past weekend was Beijing’s lack of respect for Hong Kong’s distinct culture.  There was the photo below, which graced the front pages of several local newspapers and filled my Facebook and Twitter feed:
Many joked: “Hong Kong or Pyongyang?” My question: was this necessary, considering the anxiety Hong Kong people feel already? (Some also wondered why four microphones were required, as the volume from one could’ve been turned up if he really needed it.) Then there’s the case of a journalist who shouted a question at Hu Jintao regarding June 4.  He was taken away by police and “interrogated” for 15 minutes before being released.  In my view, the police will have to give a firm explanation of why the reporter was removed, because shouting out a question is a time-honoured journalistic tradition in the free world. Read more: http://www.zhongnanhaiblog.com/?p=556

Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Albert Camus's lecture 'The Human Crisis', New York, March 1946. 'No cause justifies the murder of innocents'

Etel Adnan - To Be In A Time Of War

After the Truth Shower

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)