Patrick Wintour: Russia’s belief in Nato ‘betrayal’ – and why it matters today
The current confrontation between Russia and the west is fuelled by many grievances, but the greatest is the belief in Moscow that the west tricked the former Soviet Union by breaking promises made at the end of the cold war in 1989-1990 that Nato would not expand to the east. In his now famous 2007 speech to the Munich Security Conference, Vladimir Putin accused the west of forgetting and breaking assurances, leaving international law in ruins.
Does the betrayal claim matter? It matters desperately to Russia since it fuels distrust, feeds Russia’s cynicism about international law and is the central motive behind Russia’s draft security treaties calling for a reversal of Nato’s extension, due to be discussed on Wednesday at the Nato-Russia Council. The betrayal theory is not confined to Putin, but was supported by Boris Yeltsin, and from mid-1995 right across the Russian political elite.
A new book, Not One
Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of the Cold War Stalemate, by the
prize-winning historian Mary Elise Sarotte, charts all the private discussions
within the western alliance and with Russia over enlargement and reveals Russia
as powerless to slow the ratchet effect of the opening of Nato’s door. The
author concludes the charge of betrayal is technically untrue, but has a
psychological truth…
Solidarity with Memorial: Russia’s most prominent
civil rights group in danger
STANISLAV MARKELOV - Patriotism as a diagnosis
Vasili
Arkhipov, the man who stopped nuclear war
Allies of slain Putin critic Nemtsov allege cover-up
after guilty verdict
Russian Justice: Sergei Magnitsky’s Torture and
Murder in Pre-Trial Detention
The destruction of society EUROZINE REVIEW
British banks handled vast sums of laundered Russian
money