Martha Nussbaum: On not hating the body

Consider the elaborate flight stratagem of Western metaphysics, where body-hatred reigned supreme (though not uncontested) for about two millennia. One might have thought that the obvious theoretical position was in the vicinity of Aristotle’s: we are animate bodies, and the soul is the living organization of our matter. And yet what amazing contortions others, and even Aristotle himself, have gone through to deny the idea that we are essentially enmattered.

To hate the body, it helps to imagine its opposite. It turns out that the incorporeal was a concept that took a very long time to be invented. Homer says that Achilles’ anger “cast many strong souls into Hades, and left the men themselves to be prey for dogs and a feast to birds.” So the body is the person; and even the psuchê is clearly something physical, albeit insubstantial and needing to drink blood in Hades in order to regain its wits. So when did Western philosophy come up with the idea that there is something about us that is totally incorporeal, and that we essentially are that immaterial super-something?

**************

I pause to celebrate a paradigm of classical scholarship, Robert Renahan’s essay, from 1980, On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality. Renahan begins by observing that more or less all previous scholars take the concept of incorporeality as obvious and therefore assume that the Greeks found it obvious, too. They therefore retroject it into texts where it does not exist. With painstaking and often withering scrutiny Renahan rebuts them, finding no solid evidence of the concept of the incorporeal — until we get to Plato. (Asomatos, the word often used later on for the incorporeal, could mean, even as late as Aristotle, simply “less dense.”) 

“For almost two thousand years,” he concludes, “the concepts of incorporeality and immateriality were central in much Western philosophical and theological speculation on such problems as the nature of God, Soul, Intellect. When all is said and done, it must be recognized that one man was responsible for the creation of an ontology which culminates in incorporeal Being as the truest and highest reality. That man was Plato.”...

https://libertiesjournal.com/articles/on-not-hating-the-body/


STANISLAV MARKELOV - Patriotism as a diagnosis


Jon Henley: Rise of far right puts Dreyfus affair into spotlight in French election race


Beginnings and Endings


Colloquium: The Disappearing Present: Reflections on Ideology - October 16, 2020


David Foster Wallace - This Is Water


Salman Rushdie: how Cervantes and Shakespeare wrote the modern literary rule book


Dag Herbjørnsrud - The African Enlightenment


Book Review: Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism in India


Seamus Heaney’s Advice to the Young. BY MARIA POPOVA


Julia Kristava: Interpreting radical evil


Evil, framed. By SLAVENKA DRAKULIĆ


The best books on Hegel: recommended by Stephen Houlgate


Hegel and the mystical tradition: Interview with Glenn Magee. By Stanislav Panin


Paul Sagar - The last hollow laugh - Francis Fukuyama and 'The End of History’


Book review: The Government of Desire


A moment of moral and political nihilism: Theologian Adam Kotsko on our current crisis


Stanley Rosen (1929-2014). A great philosopher passes


Mark Neocleous: Resisting Resilience


Society of the Spectacle / 'इमेज' - 'Image': A Poem on Deaths in the Age of Covid


Ralph Dumain - The Paranoia Papers: Selected Bibliography Theory of the (Un)Natural History of Social Paranoia


Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Goodbye Sadiq al-Azm, lone Syrian Marxist against the Assad regime