Sahitya Akademi's so-called editorial 'death knell' for Gujarati writers' free expression / Litterateurs demand withdrawal of Gujarat Sahitya Akademi editorial
In a strongly-worded statement, more than 170 Gujarat cultural personalities, activists and academics have strongly protested against “threats" issued against Gujarati writers in the Gujarat Sahitya Academi journal “Shabdsrushti” through an anonymous writeup under the titled “No, This Is Not a Poem, It Is Misuse of a ‘Poem’ for Anarchy…”
Supposedly an editorial, published, ironically on page 89 of
the journal, says the statement, seeks to accuse the writers seeking to
criticise the government handling of the pandemic as “anti-national literary
Naxals” and "attempts to create an atmosphere of hostility" towards
them. It is said to have been written by
Gujarat Sahitya Akademi chief Vishnu Pandya, a known Narendra Modi protege, in
response to sharply critical poems by Parul Khakhar, hailing from from the
Saurashtra region.
Shav Vahini Ganga (Hindi Punjabi English) शव वाहिनी गंगा
While one Khakhar's poems, Shav Vahini Ganga says, “Saheb,
the Ganga carries corpses in your Ramraj…” has gone viral, another one, “Tare
Bolvu Nahi” (You Shouldn’t Speak), seeks to echo the alleged attack on free
speech under the Modi government.
Text: Gujarat Sahitya Akademi whose autonomy was wrested by the Gujarat government, which then turned it into a government institution, publishes a journal named "Shabdsrushti". The June 2021 issue of "Shabdsrushti" carries an anonymous piece of writing titled “No, This Is Not a Poem, It Is Misuse of a ‘Poem’ for Anarchy…” on page 89. The necessary obligation of writing the author’s name is not honoured which should be deemed immoral, criminal and dangerous according to government procedures.
It is perfectly legitimate for a writer to write about a specific poem in his
or her name, to express views on it and to criticise it. Criticism, debate and
dissent are the strength of a healthy democracy. However, this writing offers a
vague criticism “about one Gujarati poem” without naming it. Similarly, without
naming the poet it mentions patronizingly that she has been a beneficiary of
the Akademi in the past.
The anonymous writer makes outrageous statements such as ‘the poem is bad though the poet is good’, and through such insinuations attempts to issue an indirect threat to Gujarati writers indicating in an authoritative voice what they should write and what they should not write. This is reminiscent of the time of the Emergency (during the Emergency in 1975 newspapers and journals had to be approved by government officials) and is absolutely condemnable. This is beating the pen with the hammer, a death knell for the right to freedom of expression of Gujarati writers.
Moreover, the accusation that this poem has encouraged anti national “literary Naxals” and destructive elements that are trying to create anarchy in the country, and are involved in anti-national activities by shooting off the poet’s shoulder is extremely shocking.
Through such accusations the anonymous writer attempts to
create an atmosphere of hostility towards writers who engage in creative
activity in a democratic manner and become the voice of contemporary times as
well as towards hundreds of thousands of readers of Gujarati literature who
appreciate the writings of these writers.
In an attempt to gag the glorious literary tradition of
Gujarat this government-controlled institution, which functions in a democratic
structure, has opened the floodgates for a practice that goes against the
interests of the people and has a dangerous and fascist tendency which we
strongly condemn.
We believe that to write poetry in a democratic tradition,
to be a custodian of society through writing poetry, to debate contemporary
issues, to criticize actions or inaction of those in power through writing, is
also an important part of a healthy democracy.
Recalling what the Supreme Court said a few days ago that to criticize the government is not sedition, we appeal to the editor of "Shabdsrushti", chairperson of Gujarat Sahitya Akademi and the government of Gujarat to withdraw this writing which is a blot on the Gujarati language and Gujarat.
Click here for signatories
https://www.counterview.net/2021/06/sahitya-akademi-editorial-death-knell.html
Litterateurs demand withdrawal of Gujarat Sahitya Akademi editorial
At least 169 well-known literary figures of Gujarat have
issued a statement demanding withdrawal of the editorial by Gujarat Sahitya
Akademi president Vishnu Pandya that had called all those praising the poem,
“Shav vahini Ganga”, by Amreli-based poet, Parul Khakhar, as “literary naxals”.
The personalities include artists Gulammohammad Sheikh and
Mallika Sarabhai, MLA Jignesh Mevani, sociologist Ghanshyam Shah, economist
Indira Hirway, filmmaker Mehul Devkala and activist Nirjhari Sinha.
Meanwhile, Khakhar has put out another piece titled “Taarey
bolvanu nahin” (You should not speak) in a journal, Nireekshak, by activist,
writer, and president of the Gujarat Sahitya Parishad, Prakash N Shah. Nearly
half of the 16 contributions in the journal authored by Salil Tripathi, Ramesh
Savani, Manishi Jani, Yogesh Joshi, Pravin Darzi among others are literary
pieces in protest of Gujarat Sahitya Akademi’s stand against Khakhar.
Gujarati Poet Parul Khakkar Blames
'Naked King' for Corpses Floating in the Ganga
A
Call for National Mourning and a Proposal for a National Government. By Anil
Nauriya
ना भूलना तुम : By Dr Raju Sharma, ex IAS
Society
of the Spectacle / 'इमेज' - 'Image': A Poem on Deaths in the Age of
Covid
Nandini
Sen Mehra: And night has come upon my land
The
Hindu priest struggling to cremate India’s Covid dead – video
Bharat Bhushan: It suits the RSS to allow BJP to encourage defections from other parties
Rihanna and Greta prompt an MEA outburst — and a hashtag firestorm
Avay Shukla: Acts Of God And Follies Of Man
Kunal Kamra and the Elasticity of
Justice. By Avay Shukla
The
essay by AK Ramanujan censored by DU's Academic Council
A
K Ramanujan works dropped from new DU syllabus
Sambhaji
Brigade vandalised the Bhandarkar Institute in Pune in 2004
Javed Anand - Ms Wadud, we are ashamed
The
Return of the Show Trial: China’s Televised “Confessions”. By Magnus Fiskesjö
Tom
Phillips - Cambridge University Press accused of 'selling its soul' over
Chinese censorship
Book
reviews - ‘Tombstone: The Great Chinese Famine, 1958-1962,’ by Yang Jisheng
The
People's Republic of Thuggery - Chinese agents bar access to the 'free' wife of
Liu Xiaobo
Stephen
Alter - The right of the reader
Speaking
freely - essays on speech & censorship
Infochange
Agenda # on censorship: The Limits of Freedom
Everything and Nothing by Jorge Luis
Borges // "Borges and I"
This year's Oscars could have been a
moment of pride for China. Then politics got in the way
The Tremendous World I Have Inside My Head: Franz Kafka: A Biographical Essay
Books reviewed - Lost in
Transformation: biographies of Franz Kafka
'Before the Law' - a parable by
Franz Kafka
Ilya Erenburg: The Thaw (Novyi mir
Spring 1954)
Modi says Congress committed 'sin' of partition // The Non-politics of the RSS