Pratap Bhanu Mehta: SC was never perfect, but the signs are that it is slipping into judicial barbarism
In political science literature there is a familiar term — democratic barbarism. Democratic barbarism is often sustained by a judicial barbarism. The term “barbarism” has several components. The first is the overwhelming appearance of arbitrariness in judicial decision-making. The application of law becomes so dependent on the arbitrary whims of individual judges that the rule of law or constitutional terms no longer have any meaning. The law becomes an instrument of oppression; or, at the very least, it aids and abets oppression.
This usually means weak protection for civil liberties and
dissenters and an unusual degree of deference to state power, especially in
constitutional matters. The court also becomes excessively concerned with its
version of lese majesty: Like a scared monarch, the court cannot be seriously
criticised or mocked. Its majesty is secured not by its credibility but by its
power of contempt. And, finally, there is barbarism in a much deeper sense. It
occurs when the state treats a section of its own citizenry as enemies of the
people. The purpose of politics is no longer equal justice for all: It is to
convert politics into a game of victims and oppressors and ensure that your
side comes up the winner.
The Indian Supreme Court was never perfect. It has had its
dark periods before. But the signs are that it is slipping into judicial
barbarism in the senses described above. This phenomenon is not just a matter
of individual judges or individual cases. It is now a systematic phenomenon
with deep institutional roots. It is also part of a global trend, of a piece
with developments in Turkey, Poland and Hungary, where the judiciary aids this
kind of democratic barbarism….
Supreme Court lays
emphasis on protecting personal liberty
Avay Shukla: Acts Of God And Follies Of Man
Colin Gonsalves:
Refusal of bail to Sudha Bharadwaj is based on inadmissible evidence
Samjhauta Express blast case verdict: ‘Who will answer for death of my
five children?’
Jailed and Harassed Former IGP Darapuri, 76, Shares His Ordeal
Prem Shankar Jha: The Shadow of Haren Pandya’s Case Lies Long Over
Justice Arun Mishra
‘This episode is going to
haunt SC in years to come’: Justice AP Shah on CJI sexual harassment case
Hannah
Ellis-Petersen: Actor's death fuels media frenzy in India