This scientist destroyed climate change deniers in a single viral post
Hayhoe wrote
particularly critically of those who imply that dissenting voices are
suppressed - arguing that they're not, they're simply contradicted with
evidence. But over the last 10
years, at least 38 papers were published in peer-reviewed journals, each
claiming various reasons why climate wasn't changing, or if it was, it wasn't
humans, or it wasn't bad.
They weren't
suppressed. They're out there, where anyone can find them. So we took those
papers and - thanks to the superhuman efforts of my colleague Rasmus Benestad -
recalculated all their analyses. From scratch. And you know what we
found? Every single one of
those analyses had an error - in their assumptions, methodology, or analysis -
that, when corrected, brought their results into line with the scientific
consensus.
It's real, it's us,
it's serious. The study found that
some scientists were 'cherry picking' data and using flawed methodologies to
reach their conclusions. One study, for
example, tried to blame global warming on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn.... read more:
The Amazon
is burning. The climate is changing. And we're doing nothing to stop itKeeping up
with China: US Navy orders $22 billion worth of submarines // World military
expenditure grows to $1.8 trillion in 2018