BJP’s Repeated Attempts to Bypass Legislature Are Threatening Parliament’s Authority. BY JAIVEER SHERGILL
When Narendra Modi
stepped into the Parliament House for the first time in May 2014, the prime
minister-designate knelt and touched his forehead on the main entry gate. “This
is the temple of democracy,” he proclaimed. However, owing to
the arbitrary functioning of his government, this “temple of democracy” has
witnessed a travesty of constitutional propriety on a number of occasions.
The manner in
which repeated changes in the Goods
and Services Tax (GST) rates are being announced by the finance minister, when
an amendment to the GST legislation is yet to be passed by the parliament, is a
signal of the erosion of the authority and legitimacy of the parliament.
It is a negation of the fundamental principles of our parliamentary
system and constitutional provisions.
Ours is a
parliamentary system of government based on the Westminster model. The
constitution has vested the power over the purse in the hands of chosen
representatives of the people, thus sanctifying the principle of ‘no taxation
without representation’. The accountability of the government to citizens is
implemented through scrutiny of its work by the parliament. Therefore, there
was a touch of irony in the government’s announcements on GST bypassing the
legislature. After a
prolonged opposition to the GST, the
BJP realised the benefits of the law only after coming to power. The
Congress had prepared a robust framework for a single unified indirect tax
structure. However, post its implementation by the BJP, the outcome has been
completely different from the conceived taxation model, defying the very
purpose the tax reform was conceptualised for the Indian economy. Consequently,
many structural flaws remain unaddressed.
The government had
consistently maintained that it was not possible to cap tax rates at 18%
in the GST Constitutional Amendment Bill when it was tabled in the
parliament. But the hurried manner with which the rates were revised and the
fact that a majority of items which were in the 28% bracket were
scaled down to 18% indicates that the government erred by ignoring the Congress’s
suggestions for an 18% cap on GST rates. The government had
avoided debates and discussions in the Rajya Sabha by snubbing the upper house
on the GST Bill. There was an opportunity to go before the parliament, explain
the structural flaws in the legislation and seek parliamentary approval for the
revision. However, once again, parliament’s scrutiny was bypassed. Unwillingness of the
Modi government to subject itself to parliamentary scrutiny reveals two things
– its autocratic way of functioning and its vulnerability
to defend itself against the irrational decisions it has taken.
This government isn’t
forthcoming either about the economic or foreign policy.
Ironically, members of parliament come to know about the Modi government’s
activities through the media. Why is the government trying to justify its
actions through the media and not through the parliament? This is a worrying
sign so far as our parliamentary democracy is concerned. How can a government
sacrifice a parliament session for a state election? This is a strategic move
to avoid public embarrassment because of the failures of demonetisation, GST
and other socio-economic and foreign policy fiascos on jobs, Kashmir,
corruption, Doklam and post-Doklam Chinese aggression and the deteriorating
cohesion of the social order under Prime Minister Modi.
People are agitated.
Many important legislations are pending for parliament’s consideration. Sensing
the mood of the nation, the Modi government has curtailed
the winter session of parliament – this time around, the winter
session is expected to have around 14 sittings and will be one of the shortest
in the last decade. Neither in 2002, 2007
nor in the 2012 Gujarat assembly elections were parliament sessions postponed
or curtailed. In 2002, the winter session was held from November 18 to December
20, in 2007 from November 15 to December 7 and in 2012 from November 22 to
December 20. The BJP has a history of vilification of parliament. It was during
the government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee that the demands for grants of all the
ministries were guillotined for the first time in history. The demands of only
one ministry – agriculture – were discussed exactly for 15 minutes. Balram
Jakhar spoke for those 15 minutes. While in opposition during the UPA regime,
BJP kept on paralysing the legislature on issues which now are the priorities
of their government.
Once the seat of power
was occupied by the BJP, governance through legislation took a backseat.
Ordinances became the preferred means of introducing legislative enactments. On
an average, Modi government has promulgated ten ordinances per year. It went to
the extreme end of specifically proroguing parliament to issue the Uttarakhand
Appropriation (Vote on Account) Ordinance, 2016.
Constitution experts
were surprised when the Aadhaar Bill was certified as a money bill simply to
avoid Rajya Sabha scrutiny. The Bill had nothing to do with imposition,
abolition or alteration of tax nor dealt with any financial obligation by the
government. Successive attempts to bypass the legislature have eroded the
credibility of parliament as an institution of accountability. Modi’s
style of governance undermines the relevance of legislative oversight. He has
set a new normal for parliamentary democracy. Genuine questions are arising
about the relevance of parliament for the present government.
The highest
institution of a democratic set up is the parliament. It represents the will of
the people. Opposition has its responsibility, but primarily it is the
responsibility of the government to ensure credibility of the parliament.
Parliament as an institution of accountability needs to be strengthened for the
parliamentary democracy to prosper.
ALSO SEE:
Bharat
Bhushan: RSS chief Golwalkar threatened to kill Gandhi - 1947
CID report
Discussion following Golwalkar expose
कुमार प्रशांत - तो राष्ट्रीय स्वंयसेवक संघ ने एक बार फिर गांधी से दो-दो हाथ करने का मन बनाया है // Bharat Bhushan: BJP icon SP Mookerjee complicit in raising funds for defending Gandhi's assassins
Discussion following Golwalkar expose
कुमार प्रशांत - तो राष्ट्रीय स्वंयसेवक संघ ने एक बार फिर गांधी से दो-दो हाथ करने का मन बनाया है // Bharat Bhushan: BJP icon SP Mookerjee complicit in raising funds for defending Gandhi's assassins
Kannan Srinivasan: A
subaltern fascism - on VD Savarkar's collaboration with the British Raj
The law of killing - a brief history of Indian fascism
The law of killing - a brief history of Indian fascism