Alex Salmond (former Scottish First Minister): The coup against Corbyn was planned to stop him calling for Blair’s head after Chilcot
It can be argued that the lack of accountability
about Iraq led Cameron on to committing many of the same blunders on a smaller
scale in Libya in 2010. In Libya the UK spent thirteen times as much bombing
the country as reconstructing it and the human chaos and bloody carnage of a
failed state now moves like the tide across the Mediterranean. If a politician gets off Scot-free with
misleading Cabinet and Parliament about the reasons for war then there are no
standards of behaviour left in British public life and no hope whatsoever of
preventing another such disaster.
In normal political times Wednesday would see the most dramatic event of the year. Thirteen years after the Iraq war and seven years after the start of his Inquiry, Sir John Chilcot will deliver his findings. In particular for the relatives of the 179 service personnel who died, but also for everyone living with the consequences of this conflict, it has been a long time coming.
In normal political times Wednesday would see the most dramatic event of the year. Thirteen years after the Iraq war and seven years after the start of his Inquiry, Sir John Chilcot will deliver his findings. In particular for the relatives of the 179 service personnel who died, but also for everyone living with the consequences of this conflict, it has been a long time coming.
However, such has been
the all enveloping chaos in Westminster too little attention has been paid to
the coming Chilcot report. When the European roof is falling in on one Prime
Minister it is difficult to concentrate on just how a previous one destabilised
the planet. Behind his increasingly
furrowed brows Gordon Brown might be forgiven for thinking that his own rocky
premiership will be reassessed as a period of relative calm between two great
disasters.
It would be a mistake
to believe that Chilcot and current events are entirely unconnected. The link
is through the Labour Party. I have been puzzling
as to exactly why the Parliamentary Labour Party chose this moment to launch
their coup against Jeremy Corbyn and just what explains the desperation to get
him out last week. It can hardly be because of a European referendum where
Corbyn's campaigning, although less than energetic, was arguably more visible
than that of say the likely big political winner Teresa May?
Would it not have been
more sensible and certainly less damaging simply to put up another candidate
against Corbyn and argue the case to the country? It certainly would have made
for less of a pantomime and, with both establishment parties holding
simultaneous leadership elections, it would have minimised the damage. So what exactly
was the urgency in getting the removal vans to visit the Corbyn's office last
week?
I had a conversation
on exactly this point with veteran Labour firebrand Dennis Skinner. He answered
in one word “Iraq”. The Skinner line is that the coup was timed to avoid Corbyn
calling for Blair’s head next Wednesday from the Despatch Box. Indeed many
would say that when Corbyn stated that he would be prepared to see a former
Labour Prime Minister tried for War Crimes then he sealed his fate as leader of
the Parliamentary Labour Party.
Remember until last
week his Foreign Affairs spokesperson was Hilary Benn, not only a supporter of
the Iraq War but someone who first became a Cabinet Minister as part of the
delayed fallout from the resignation of Clare Short in 2003. Indeed Benn had
the “reconstruction” of Iraq as part of his Ministerial brief. At this juncture it
looks as if the coup has stalled and Corbyn will survive to fight just one last
day on Wednesday. However, will the Chilcot account give him the ammunition he
needs or will it be yet another establishment whitewash in the long litany of
British cover ups from Suez onwards?
Chilcot will not be a
verdict, that much is clear. However, it could still supply the damning
evidence for the jury to bring a conviction in. In a triumph of hope over
experience my political sense tells me to expect fireworks. This is not so much
from the inscrutable, indeed invisible, behaviour of ex-Whitehall mandarin
Chilcott but more from the behaviour of Blair. Call this my contribution to the
'Blair Watch Project'. Just before the
European referendum came to the crunch Blair was back, complete with yellowish
tan, haunting the TV studios like some unwanted poltergeist.
Remember Blair has
already seen the passages about him in the report. Indeed he has had months
closeted way with his lawyers and spin doctors to determine his best lines of
defence. In stark contrast the families of the dead will get but two hours of
advance notice. Why then would Blair
decide to launch his pre-emptive strike if he wasn’t deeply worried about the
Chilcot contents? What would be the point? Surely he would just have kept
schtum and waited for absolution on the day.
The fact that Blair
didn’t plead the fifth tells me that Chilcot is likely to be damaging and that
Corbyn will have his opportunity to paint the difference between a Labour Prime
Minister who led the country and the world to disaster and a Labour leader who
has consistently opposed reckless adventurism in Foreign policy. It might even remind
some Labour members why they voted for Corbyn in the first place to get a clean
break with the past, particularly if he is opposed by another Iraq War
supporter like Angela Eagle.
However this is much
bigger than a Labour Party matter. Across the House of Commons there are MPs
determined to press the issue home. If a politician gets
off Scot-free with misleading Cabinet and Parliament about the reasons for war
then there are no standards of behaviour left in British public life and no
hope whatsoever of preventing another such disaster.
Alex Salmond raises prospect of Tony Blair being tried for war crimes in Scottish courts
Sarah Helm - The phone call from George Bush that told Tony Blair he’d failed on Iraq
It can be argued that
the lack of accountability about Iraq led Cameron on to committing many of the
same blunders on a smaller scale in Libya in 2010. In Libya the UK spent
thirteen times as much bombing the country as reconstructing it and the human
chaos and bloody carnage of a failed state now moves like the tide across the
Mediterranean.
And so it is with
renewed determination that on Wednesday I will move into a secure room to read
the Chilcot report, hoping that at last we will have the Blair’s big lie
nailed, have exposed the pre-commitments made to Bush in 2002 and then find the
correct mechanism of holding the disgraced ex Prime Minister to account.
It is unfinished
business.
