The emperor's masks: 'apolitical' RSS calls the shots in Modi sarkar
The Emperor’s Masks
It is deceitful of the RSS to compare themselves to any other civil
society organization, rather than to the National Advisory Council to which
they had strenuously objected. No other NGO exercises ideological control over
the government and maintains a vast cadre of political activists, many of whom
undergo arms training. None of them can summon government ministers for
discussions.
The RSS sustains many front organisations that do its bidding. Prior to
the 2014 general elections, the leader of one such front, VHP President Togadia, reminded Muslims of the violence in
Gujarat and Muzzafarnagar. It is unlikely that he will be punished for hate
speech. The Bajrang Dal is another front. One of its local leaders hailed the
murder of Professor Kalburgi and warned of more such outrages. In fact, BJP
members had participated in threatening demonstrations at Kalburgi's house. One
union minister of state is accused of incitement in the Muzzafanagar violence.
Their involvement in the Vyapam scandal has been exposed by whistle-blowers who
had once been its own cadre.
In interviews published in February 2014, Swami
Aseemanand implicated the highest RSS leadership in the Samjhauta Express terrorist
attacks. Thereafter little was heard of these serious allegations. Recently the
public prosecutor in the Malegaon terror case alleged that she was asked to
sabotage the case.
Prima facie all these are criminal activities – why are they covered up
by elected representatives who have sworn to uphold the Constitution? Why do most
of our public commentators avoid the issue of violence and intimidation, while
waxing eloquent about economic reform?
The RSS is
obsessed with nation-worship and the conviction that its adherents are the only
genuine 'patriots'. All their critics and members of specified religious groups
are deemed to be 'anti-national'. This relentless demonisation of entire
communities is the emotional fuel that drives the RSS. Standardization,
uniformity and compulsion are the base ideals of its concept of India and
Hinduism. An example of this is their campaign against the inclusion of AK
Ramanujan’s The Three Hundred Ramayanas in the Delhi University History
syllabus.
In the midst of the
Emergency of 1975,
Sarsanghchalak M.D. Deoras wrote to Indira Gandhi stressing RSS loyalty to the
government. He asserted that the RSS ‘keeps itself aloof from power politics.’
In 2000 Vajpayee stated that the RSS
was not political –
this was to support Keshubhai Patel’s order enabling it to recruit within the
ranks of the Gujarat state administration. In 2013, as their involvement in politics became crystal clear,
senior RSS leader M.G. Vaidya
asserted that ‘no promise was ever made to the government in 1949 ahead of
lifting of the ban on it that it will never enter politics.’ The RSS is political, apolitical and
non-political as per convenience.
The RSS was banned in February 1948, following Gandhiji’s
assassination. The circular issued by the Home Ministry under their icon Sardar
Patel mentioned the ‘cult of violence sponsored and inspired by the
activities of the Sangh’. It spoke of its indulgence in arson, robbery,
dacoity and murder and the collection of illicit arms and ammunition; ‘activities
(that) have been carried on under a cloak of secrecy’. The ban order was lifted
in July 1949; after discussions between Patel and Golwalkar, in which it
was understood that the RSS would ‘restrict itself to the cultural sphere,
abjure violence and secrecy, be loyal to the Constitution and provide for a
democratic organization.’
The RSS's activities over the decades demonstrate scant respect for this
agreement. Here is a list of judicial commissions of inquiry regarding major
communal carnages: Jagmohan Reddi Commission (Ahmedabad, 1969); D.P. Madon
Commission (Bhiwandi, Jalgaon and Mahad, 1970); Joseph Vithayathil Commission
(Tellicherry, 1971); Jitendra Narain Commission (Jamshedpur, 1979);
Venugopal Commission (Kanyakumari, 1982); B.N. Srikrishna Commission
(Mumbai, 1992-93). Two threads run through all these reports: one, the criminal
role of Hindutva organisations in masterminding the violence; two, the partisan
conduct of the police. Why do our elite condemn the violence of Maoists and
Islamists, but condone the violence of the ‘Parivar’?
Violence is the deadliest epidemic of our
time, yet the one most evaded. How does the BJP/RSS discuss this issue? They deliberately evade the act of murder. After a
perfunctory condemnation of Kalburgi’s murder, for example, their spokespersons
keep their focus on the Sangh’s grievance against the victim. It is almost as if they know the motives of
the murderers. This is strange, given their claim that they have no connection
with the criminals. The same may be said for protests against this or that
film, book and cartoon. For those of us who are more offended by murder than by
controversial ideas or cartoons, the crucial question is: Why do you always
change the subject? Why do you justify political assassination?
Patriotism is often used to cover up evil deeds. Is it patriotism to
murder elderly scholars and boast about it? The
RSS worships not Divinity but power - its nationalism is a form of atheism. A standardized
version of Hindu culture is being mixed with perpetual communal hatred to create
an army of foot soldiers. Democracy is being manipulated to install a local version
of the rule of the Ayatollahs.
If the Sangh Parivar loves India so much,
they should cease the destruction of our institutions of justice and knowledge.
If they admire Hindu civilisation, they should refrain from confusing pragnya
with propaganda, wisdom with cunning. A political project shaped around the
ideal of historical revenge and the humiliation of your fellow citizens is a
recipe for perpetual strife.
The RSS has emerged as an extra-constitutional authority. Did Modi tell
his voters in 2014 that he would give the RSS informal entry into the
Government of India? Its political influence is a portent of the creeping dissolution
of state authority, similar to what has taken place in Pakistan, where state-enabled
fanatics now hold sway over the state. Its cultural politics will produce a worsening stink as the months and years roll
by. Justice, harmony, probity and even politeness in ordinary speech will be
thrown into the cesspit of communal politics.
Fanatics are equally
dangerous, whether they fly the flag of Islam or of Hindutva. Bureaucrats,
judicial and police officers should remember that they are servants of the
Constitution and not of the government of the day. The foul language and crimes
unfolding before us are a warning. Only an alert
citizenry can stop these unscrupulous ideologues from destroying the democratic
institutions of the Indian Union.
http://www.catchnews.com/politics-news/the-emperor-s-masks-apolitical-rss-calls-the-shots-in-modi-sarkar-1441633490.html
see also
The importance of Professor Kalburgi
"Leftists never condemn Islamist terror"
Jyoti Punwani - Let us not give our Islamic neighbour a run for its money
RSS Declared Unlawful: Text of GOI communique February 4, 1948
Smruti Koppikar - Maharashtra CM has no will to pursue my father’s murder
Petition in Supreme Court Accuses NIA of Soft-Pedaling Hindutva Terror Cases
After Malegaon, Ajmer Blast Case Faces Allegations of Sabotage // Witnesses turn hostile in Samjhauta case
The law of killing: a brief history of Indian fascism
see also
The importance of Professor Kalburgi
"Leftists never condemn Islamist terror"
Jyoti Punwani - Let us not give our Islamic neighbour a run for its money
RSS Declared Unlawful: Text of GOI communique February 4, 1948
Smruti Koppikar - Maharashtra CM has no will to pursue my father’s murder
Petition in Supreme Court Accuses NIA of Soft-Pedaling Hindutva Terror Cases
After Malegaon, Ajmer Blast Case Faces Allegations of Sabotage // Witnesses turn hostile in Samjhauta case
The law of killing: a brief history of Indian fascism
The Broken Middle - my essay on the 30th anniversary of 1984
The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi: Inquiry Commission Report (1969)
The Abolition of truth
RSS tradition of manufacturing facts to suit their ideology
The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi: Inquiry Commission Report (1969)
The Abolition of truth
RSS tradition of manufacturing facts to suit their ideology