Javed Akhtar says he is as opposed to Muslim fundamentalists as he is to Hindu extremism
Noted film personality Javed Akhtar says he is as opposed to Muslim fundamentalists as he is to Hindu extremism, noting that he has even received death threats from Muslims because of his outspokenness. Defending his recent interview in which he drew parallels between the Taliban and Hindu extremists, he said Hindus are the most decent and tolerant people in the world but while the Taliban have a free hand in Afghanistan, India”s secularism is protected by its Constitution and courts.
Akhtar expressed the views in a statement to PTI, days after remarking on a TV channel that while the Taliban were “barbaric”, those in India supporting Hindu right-wing organisations were “all the same”. “India can never become like Afghanistan because Indians by nature, are not extremists; it is in their DNA to be moderate, to keep to the middle of the road,” he said in the emailed statement.
Sunita
Viswanath: Why I feel the need to bring my Hinduism to the streets
Sunita Viswanath - I refuse to cede Hinduism to those who want to make India a Hindu rashtra
Public Appeal by Hindus for Human Rights,
USA
“Yes, in this interview I expressed my reservations against organizations affiliated to the Sangh Parivar. I am opposed to any school of thought that divides people on the basis of religion, caste and creed and I stand by all those who are against any such discrimination,” he added. The noted screenwriter and lyricist said he finds many commonalities between the mindsets of the Taliban and the Hindu right-wing. “My critics are also outraged that I find a lot of commonalities between the mindsets of Taliban and the Hindu right-wing. As a matter of fact, there is a lot of commonality. The Taliban is forming an Islamic government based on religion, the Hindu right-wing wants a Hindu Rashtra,” Akhtar said.
“The Taliban wants to curb women rights and put them on the margin, the Hindu right-wing has also made it clear that they don’t like the freedom of women and girls; right from UP, Gujarat to Karnataka young men and women have been beaten mercilessly for sitting together in a restaurant or a garden or any public place. Like the Muslim fanatics, even the Hindu right-wing does not accept the right of women to choose their spouse, he said. “Recently a very important right-wing leader said that women are not capable of being left on their own or being independent. Like the Taliban the Hindu right-wing also claims the superiority of faith and ‘astha’ over any man-made law or court,” Akhtar wrote.
“The Taliban has no love lost for any minority; similarly, what kind of thoughts and feelings the Hindu right-wing nurtures for the minority is evident from their speeches and slogans and whenever they get an opportunity, by their actions,” he said. The only difference between the Taliban and these extremist groups is that the Taliban today have unchallenged power in Afghanistan with no one to question them while in India there is a huge resistance against the Indian version of this Talibani ideology which is totally in conflict with the Constitution of India, he said.
“Our constitution does
not discriminate on the basis of religion, community, caste or gender. We have
institutions like the judiciary and media too. The key point of departure
between the two is the Taliban has achieved its goal in Afghanistan. The Hindu
right-wing is doing its best to get us there. Fortunately, this is India and
there are the Indian people who are providing a stiff resistance,” he said.
Speaking to NDTV on September 3 about the rising hate crimes against Muslims in India, Akhtar had warned that such incidents were “kind of a dress rehearsal for becoming like full-fledged Taliban”. Akhtar said he had no idea that his comments would generate such sharp reactions. “On one hand, there are some people who have expressed their outrage and anger in the strongest language possible, on the other hand, there are people from every nook and corner of the country who have given me messages of solidarity and expressed their total agreement with my point of view,” he said in the statement.
“My detractors have
said that while I am criticizing the Hindu right-wing I have never stood
against fanatics among the Muslim fold. They have accused me of not saying
anything about triple
talaq, of not speaking on purdah or any other regressive practice within
the Muslim community. I am not surprised at the fact that they are totally
unaware of my activities over the years,” he said.
“Over the past two
decades, I have been given police protection twice because of the threats to my
life from fanatical Muslims: first, because not only had I vociferously opposed
triple talaq when the issue was not on the national radar, but I had, along with
an organisation named Muslims for Secular Democracy (MSD), toured several
cities across India like Hyderabad, Allahabad, Kanpur and Aligarh and from a
variety of public platforms spoken out against this retrograde practice,” he
said.
Joint Statement of Religious Leaders On “Supreme
Court order on Section 377”
RSS backs Supreme Court order on gay sex // Vikram
Seth slams Supreme Court order on Section 377
A mother and a judge speaks out on section 377
Lakshmi Chaudhry - SC verdict on 377: Why Indians,
gay and straight, must all despair
Swati Chaturvedi: It Was BJP Who Made It
Mamata vs Modi. Too Far
Peter
Ronald deSouza: The Intrinsic Limits of Hindutva as an Ideology of the Indian
State
Anand K. Sahay: The idea behind capturing
power in any kind of way: fair or foul
Bharat
Bhushan - RSS chief Golwalkar threatened to kill Gandhi - 1947 CID report
Bharat Bhushan: It suits the RSS to allow
BJP to encourage defections from other parties
Modi says Congress committed 'sin' of
partition // The Non-politics of the RSS
Sakshi Maharaj reveals the BJP's long
standing tie to Nathuram Godse
Chhattisgarh govt says staff can join RSS,
service rules don’t apply (2015)
NIVEDITA MENON: If Hindutva is dismantled,
whom will it harm?
Nivedita Menon: Toolkits of democracy and a
paranoid Hindu Rashtra
MANINI CHATTERJEE - Manufacturing an icon:
The Deendayal Upadhyaya blitzkrieg
Delhi Police Archive on RSS activity in
October-December 1947
CPI's Dhanwantri report: Bleeding Punjab
Warns
The Supreme Court, Gandhi and the RSS
The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi: Inquiry Commission Report (1969)
The emperor's masks: 'apolitical' RSS calls the
shots in Modi sarkar
एक बात हमेशा ज़हन में सवाल खड़े करती है A question that stays with
me... / Ravish Kumar's Speech at Berkeley (2019)
Ramachandra Guha: Gandhi
said RSS was ‘communal with a totalitarian outlook’ – and that’s still true
Mukul Kesavan: Against forgetting
Ajmer blast case: Two including a former RSS worker get life imprisonment
Julio Ribeiro - Burying Karkare: I cannot let these
forces go unchallenged
Terrifying implications of the SC's Staines
Judgement
Foreign Minister S Jaishankar Is Fighting With
Historian Ramachandra Guha On Nehru's Cabinet
Vyapam
whistleblower Anand Rai questions why the RSS has deserted him
The emperor's masks: 'apolitical' RSS calls
the shots in Modi sarkar
The law of
killing - a brief history of Indian fascism
The Instigator: How MS Golwalkar’s virulent ideology
underpins Modi’s India. By HARTOSH SINGH BAL
Some information
for Israelis (and the rest of us)
A subaltern
fascism? - by Kannan Srinivasan
Madhu Limaye's
observations on the RSS (1979)
मुझे पूरी उम्मीद है कि आप अपनी बारी आने से पहले बोलेंगे- डॉ.आनंद तेलतुंबड़े
Avay
Shukla: IT'S TIME TO BE OUTRAGED , MY LORDS.
Father
Stan Swamy: I’d rather suffer, possibly die if things go on as it is
WANTED:
Immediate Justice in the Bhima-Koregaon Conspiracy. By Cedric Prakash
Colin Gonsalves: Refusal of bail to Sudha Bharadwaj
is based on inadmissible evidence
Pratap Bhanu Mehta - The biggest casualty in the Alok Verma affair has
been the SC’s authority
RSS and Modi brazenly intimidating the Supreme Court
Prem Shankar Jha: The Shadow
of Haren Pandya’s Case Lies Long Over Justice Arun Mishra
Ajaz
Ashraf - A police officer's account of being harassed for stopping a riot in
Rajasthan
Samjhauta Express blast case verdict: ‘Who will
answer for death of my five children?’
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
