RSS and Modi brazenly intimidating the Supreme Court
NB: Now that the CJI is not doing their bidding, the Sangh Parivar is abusing judges who in their eyes refuse to assist the RSS plan to instigate communal frenzy prior to the 2019 elections. The RSS' commitment to justice is a joke: who caused the crucial file in the Aseemanand case to disappear, and the trial court judge to resign in disgust? These people are shameless and brazen in their threats of disorder. Who is Indresh to instruct SC judges to resign? How can the Prime Minister make demands of the SC? The whole world should note the RSS' utter contempt for the Indian constitution and lawful governance. They talk and behave as if the entire country and all state officials are their bonded slaves. We must not be silenced, nor allow this hooliganism to triumph. DS
Claiming that the Centre plans to bring a
law on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute but has been silent in view of
the Model Code of Conduct for the ongoing Assembly elections, RSS leader
Indresh Kumar Tuesday attacked the Supreme Court’s “three-judge bench… known to
the public” for “delaying” a decision on the Ayodhya title suit. He said if someone goes to the Supreme
Court against the law that the government plans to bring, “it is possible that
the Chief Justice will issue a stay (Ho sakta hai aadesh laane ke khilaf koi
sarfira Supreme Court jayega, toh aaj ka Chief Justice usey stay bhi kar sakta
hai)”.
Referring to the CJI-led bench’s decision
to defer hearing on the Ayodhya matter to January, Indresh said: “I haven’t
taken names because 125 crore Indians know their names… the three-judge bench…
they delayed, they denied, they disrespected”. He then went on to say “will the
country be so handicapped” that it lets “two-three” judges “throttle its
beliefs, democracy, Constitution and fundamental rights.” Speaking at a seminar
titled ‘Janmabhoomi mein anyay kyun’, organised by the Joshi Foundation on the
campus of the Panjab University, Indresh said: “Will you and I watch
helplessly? Why, and for what? Jo aatankwad ko ardh raatri mein sun sakte hain,
woh shanti ko apmaan aur uphas kar de (Should those who hear cases against
terror at midnight insult and ridicule peace)… Even the English did not have
the courage to perpetrate such atrocities on the judicial process.”
“Is it not so serious?
We saw the black day of the Indian judicial system when justice was delayed and
denied by disrespecting the beliefs of people. Supreme Court did not do it.
Judges did not do it. Judicial system did not do it. Justice did not do it. But
a few persons,” he said. He claimed there was
growing anguish against “two-three” judges. “All are looking forward to
justice. They still have belief… but the judiciary, judges and justice have
been disrespected because of two-three judges… It should be heard early. What
is the problem? Otherwise, a question arises: if they are not ready to deliver
justice, they should think if they want to remain judges or resign,” he said...