Deb Mukharji: For Indian Diplomats in Pakistan, the Run up To the 1971 War Was a Very Tense Time / Bharat Bhushan - Dhaka disconnect: Excellent relations marred by violent protests

Deb Mukharji: For Indian Diplomats in Pakistan, the Run up To the 1971 War Was a Very Tense Time    1971. The most cataclysmic year in the history of the sub-continent since the Partition of India in 1947. Even as we celebrate the 50th anniversary of Muktijuddho, the War of Liberation, India’s decisive military victory over Pakistan and the emergence of Bangladesh in the comity of nations, one must remember the extreme price exacted by a vengeful Pakistan army, the countless innocent men killed, the countless women violated.

There had been unease in the relations between the two wings of Pakistan from the very early days. Mohammed Ali Jinnah’s refusal to accept Bengali as a state language, even though it was the language of the majority, had caused him to be heckled in Dhaka University in 1948. The language movement simmered and burst into flames with the killing of students on February 21, 1952, since immortalised as ‘ekushe’, and now observed by the United Nations as International Mother Language Day. In the first elections to provincial assemblies in 1954, the Awami (then called the Awami Muslim) League led United Front trounced the Muslim League comprehensively. The 21-point manifesto of the Front demanded autonomy for East Pakistan as envisaged in the Lahore Resolution….

Bharat Bhushan - Dhaka disconnect: Excellent relations marred by violent protests

Unprecedented protests against the two-day visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Bangladesh have led to police baton-charging and firing on protestors across the country, causing nine deaths. He was invited to participate in the 50th anniversary celebrations of Bangladesh’s independence, coinciding with the centennial celebration of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s birth. The protests indicate a widening gap between the excellent functional relationship between the two governments and the perception of the people of Bangladesh.

Moreover, the protests have come at a time when the relations between the two neighbours could not be better. The invitation to Prime Minister Modi to deliver the keynote speech at the nation’s 50th anniversary celebrations was a recognition of the importance Dhaka accords to the bilateral relationship apart from the acknowledgement of India’s critical role in Bangladesh’s liberation struggle.

Indian policy makers must not blame the antipathy against India in Bangladesh on Islamic fundamentalist groups. Undeniably the most active group organising the recent protests has been the largest non-political Islamist group, Hefazat-e-Islam with its countrywide network of madrasas. But protests have also been spearheaded by the Left-wing Bangladesh Students’ Rights Council headed by Nurul Haq Nur, a former vice-president of the Dhaka University Central Students’ Union, Juba Adhikar Parishad and other non-political groups. It is noteworthy that no political flags were allowed in the protests.

In his address in Dhaka on Friday, Prime Minister Modi gave an assurance of resolving all outstanding differences. He said that both sides were aware of the “sensitivity” of the tasks ahead and the need to make “meaningful effort” towards their resolution. The effect of such friendly expression of intent on the public mood is, however, uncertain.

The most intense protests on March 26, unsurprisingly were in Chattogram, where Hefazat is headquartered. In Brahmanbaria, protestors attacked the deputy commissioner’s office, burnt tyres on roads and set fire to the railway station – one youth was shot dead on the first day of the Modi visit and five on the second. In Dhaka, protestors began a march from the country’s largest Baitul Mukarram National Mosque, shouting anti-Modi slogans and holding shoes in the air to show disrespect. They were confronted by police as well as helmet-wearing and baton-wielding activists of the ruling Awami League. Protests at Dhaka University left 20 students injured after protestors were attacked by the Chhatra League, the student wing of the ruling Awami League.

Although leaders on both sides have not let irritants in bilateral ties influence the relationship adversely, three issues irk most Bangladeshis. The inability of the two countries to come to an agreement on Teesta River water sharing, the Border Security Force (BSF) shooting Bangladeshi citizens (whom the BSF claims to be smugglers) along the 4000-km shared border; and the perception that after providing initial humanitarian help India did nothing to help Dhaka deal with the 130,000 Rohingya refugees it has been forced to look after.

However, new elements have impacted public perception under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government. Its anti-minority image and use of religion for electoral gains worries Bangladeshis. While Hindu illegal Bangladeshi migrants are eagerly accommodated as Indian citizens by the Citizenship Amendment Act, Muslim illegal migrants are dubbed “termites” to be identified and detained by compiling a National Citizens’ Register. This has seeped into the public consciousness in Bangladesh, leading to a negative public sentiment about India.

In an unprecedented development, the people of Bangladesh are keenly watching the state Assembly elections in the bordering states of West Bengal and Assam. They have earlier seen Assam elections contested through religious polarisation and now see the strategy repeated in West Bengal.

As in India, many in Bangladesh are irked by Prime Minister Modi’s detour adding Orakandi, 190 km from Dhaka, to his formal itnerary. Orakandi is the birthplace of Harichand Thakur, founder of the Matua sect of the Namshudra Dalit community. Matua migrants from Bangladesh have a significant presence in West Bengal and are said to determine electoral outcomes in more than half a dozen Assembly constituencies. They voted for the BJP in the previous West Bengal assembly elections but are unhappy at the delay in implementation of the CAA, which would have hastened the citizenship process for more recent migrants.

There is also a significant section of Bangladesh’s intelligentsia that looks askance at Prime Minister Modi’s record as the chief minister of Gujarat and his party’s current position on pluralism, its policies in Jammu & Kashmir, its push for amendment of citizenship laws and the handling of communal riots. A senior Bangladeshi politician told this correspondent that people have begun seeing the BJP as a party “weaponising religion” against Muslims, including Bangladeshis. “This has polarised public opinion against India. This was not the case earlier, even though there were differences of opinion about Indian hegemonic ambitions, trade issues, border disputes and water sharing,” he said.

While the BJP and its government cannot be expected to jettison their policies to assuage Bangladeshi sensibilities, many opinion-makers there believe that India can course-correct by resolving the thorny bilateral issues and investing in people-to-people relations. Perhaps it was to provide tangible benefits at the level of the people that Prime Minister Modi during his visit to Dhaka announced one thousand Suborno Jayanti Scholarships for Bangladesh students and invited 50 Bangladesh entrepreneurs to connect with India’s start-up ecosystem.

Public perception is also likely to become more wary of India as it becomes a frontline player in “the Quad” formed to counter growing Chinese influence. Bangladesh is reluctant to be drawn into any big power competition. It is a major beneficiary of infrastructure investments under China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese companies are involved in all the big infrastructure projects in the country from construction of the Padma Bridge, Payara deep-sea port, the Dhaka-Chattogram high-speed railway, and the tunnel connectivity project under the Karnaphuli River in Chattogram. Therefore, apart from the ideological issues, perception of India among the people of Bangladesh is likely to become even more complicated as India takes on a bigger role in the Quad.

https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/dhaka-disconnect-excellent-relations-marred-by-violent-protests-121032900101_1.html

David Bergman - As Bangladesh court reaffirms Islam as state religion, secularism hangs on to a contradiction

An Open Letter to the world on the Bangladesh crisis of 1971

Bharat Bhushan: A hanging in Dhaka, courtesy Delhi

Snigdhendu Bhattacharya: How Bangladeshi Bloggers Paid The Price For Protesting Religious Fanaticism

Conversation with Lawrence Lifschultz: The American reporter who investigated the assassination of Mujibur Rahman

Syed Badrul Ahsan - In Dhaka, return of a spectre

Imtiaz Alam Khan - History: the fall of Dhaka from Bihari eyes

Bangladesh to Exile 100K Rohingya Refugees to an Island “Prison”

Exiled Bangla poet Daud Haider refused India visa

Bangladeshi communist writer Shahzahan Bachchu gunned down

Haunted by unification: A Bangladeshi view of partition

‘This is the world’s cheapest place to scrap ships’ – but in Chittagong, it’s people who pay the price. By John Vidal

Books reviewed - Deb Mukharji: 1971, Bangladesh and the Blood Telegram

The Blood telegram


Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Goodbye Sadiq al-Azm, lone Syrian Marxist against the Assad regime