Mahatma Gandhi's Speech at his prayer meeting: New Delhi, December 22, 1947
NB: January 13, 2018 is the 70th anniversary of the start of Mahatma Gandhi's last fast; that he also called his yagna, or sacrifice. He announced his intention on January 12; and the fast continued till the 18th. On each day of his fast, he spoke to his fellow Indians in his prayer meetings, or prarthana pravachan. I shall post his speeches for the duration of the fast; as also extracts from his speeches till the last day of his life. But it is often forgotten that he was fasting for communal reconciliation. Here are the contents of the Delhi Declaration, which ended his fast, and which make clear his purposes. Some details of his assassination may be read here; the former post also contains material pertaining to the background of these events.
The document below contains his statement on December 22, 1947, about the sad fate of the tomb of Khwaja Bakhtiar Chisti in Mehrauli, and the need for it to be restored to its proper dignity. This year marks the 70 anniversary of his murder. It is a matter of grave significance for Indians of all faiths, as well as all those who believe that a stable democracy requires a foundation of friendship and mutual respect, to remember Mahatma Gandhi's last days. For he no longer belongs to us Indians, many of whom in any case have forgotten him. He was a friend of humanity. DS
The document below contains his statement on December 22, 1947, about the sad fate of the tomb of Khwaja Bakhtiar Chisti in Mehrauli, and the need for it to be restored to its proper dignity. This year marks the 70 anniversary of his murder. It is a matter of grave significance for Indians of all faiths, as well as all those who believe that a stable democracy requires a foundation of friendship and mutual respect, to remember Mahatma Gandhi's last days. For he no longer belongs to us Indians, many of whom in any case have forgotten him. He was a friend of humanity. DS
SPEECH AT PRAYER
MEETING; NEW DELHI, December 22, 1947
(Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Gandhi Heritage Portal, vol 90, p 282-4)
Some eight or ten
miles from here, at Mehrauli, there is a shrine of Qutubuddin Bakhtiyar Chisti.
Esteemed as second only to the shrine at Ajmer, it is visited every year not
only by Muslims but by thousands of non-Muslims too. Last September this shrine
was subjected to the wrath of Hindu mobs. The Muslims living in the vicinity of
the shrine for the last 800 years had to leave their homes. I mention this sad
episode to tell you that, though Muslims love the shrine, today no Muslim can
be found anywhere near it. It is the duty of the Hindus, Sikhs, the officials and
the Government to open the shrine again and wash off this stain on us. The same
applies to other shrines and religious places of Muslims in and around Delhi.
The time has come when both India and Pakistan must unequivocally declare to
the majorities in each country that they will not tolerate desecration of
religious places, be they small or big. They should also undertake to repair
the places damaged during riots.
Muslims have asked me
whether, in view of the decision of the Muslim League in Karachi, members of
the Muslim League should take part in the Conference called by Maulana Azad in Lucknow and also whether Muslims might participate in the Conference of the Muslim
League in Madras, and in any case what should be the course to be adopted by
the members of the Muslim League in India. I have not the least doubt that if they
receive a personal or public invitation they should attend the Conferences in
Lucknow and Madras. They should fearlessly and openly declare their views at
these meetings. If they have learnt anything from the 30 years of non-violent
struggle they should not worry that they are in a minority in the Indian Union
and that the majority in Pakistan can be of no help to them. It does not need
belief in non-violence to see that a minority however small it may be has no
reason to feel afraid for its honour and for the things it holds dear. If man
could but know his Maker and realize that he himself is a reflection of that
Maker, no power on earth can take away his self-respect. No one can take away
my self-respect; I can only lose it.
During my struggle against
the mighty Government of the Transvaal, a dear English friend of mine in
Johannesburg used to tell me, "I always like to be with a minority, for a
minority as a rule does not commit mistakes, and even if it does it can be
rectified. But a majority is drunk with power and it is difficult to reform
it." If by majority the friend also meant one-sided armed might he was
right. We know from bitter experience how a handful of Englishmen had transformed
themselves into a majority through force of arms and how they dominated the
whole of India. India lacked arms and, even if the arms had been there, we did
not know how to use them. It is a matter of regret that Hindus and Sikhs have not
learnt a lesson from the British rule in our country. The Muslims of the Union
suffered from false pride in their majority in the East and the West. Today
they are rid of that burden. If they now see the virtues of being a minority
they will show the beauties of Islam in their own way. They must remember that
the best days of Islam were the days of the Prophet Mohammed's minority in
Mecca. Christianity began to decline after the time of Constantine1. I do not
want to prolong the argument here. My advice emanates from my faith and if
Muslim friends do not have this faith they are free to reject it.
In my view they should
all be prepared to join the Congress. But they must not apply for entry into
that body till they are sure of a hearty welcome and equality of treatment. In principle
there is no question of majority and minority so far as the Congress is
concerned. The Congress follows no religion unless it be a religion of
humanity. It treats men and women alike. It is a purely political body in which
Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Par sees and Jews are all equal. The
Congress has not always been able to practise what it preached. This sometimes created
an impression among the Muslims that it was a caste Hindu organization.
In any case as long as
this kind of tug of war goes on Muslims should keep away with dignity. When the
Congress wants their services they should come into the Congress. Till then
they can be servants of the Congress as I am a servant of the Congress.
Although I am not a four-anna member of the Congress I have a voice in that
organization, and that is because ever since 1915 when I returned from South
Africa I have been loyally serving the Congress. If every Muslim similarly
serves the Congress he will find that his services are similarly appreciated.
Today every Muslim is
considered a supporter of the League and therefore an enemy of the Congress.
This has been the unfortunate result of the teachings of the League. Today
there is no cause left any more for enmity. Four months are a very short time
for getting rid of the poison of communalism. It is the misfortune of India
that Hindus and Sikhs took this poison to be nectar and made themselves the
enemies of the Muslim League. In returning brickbat for brickbat they brought a
stain to their name and put themselves in the same category as Muslims. I
appeal to the Muslim minority to raise themselves above this poisonous
atmosphere, to remove the suspicion that had been created concerning them and
to show that they could live in India as her honourable citizens without any
deceit and dissimulation.
One consequence of
partition is that the League cannot continue as a political organization. The
Hindu Mahasabha, the Sikh Sabha and the Par see Sabha similarly cannot continue
as political bodies. They may well stay as religious bodies. Their task then
will be internal reform of society, to search for things of religious value and
to act on them. Then the atmosphere will become free of poison and these
organizations will rival each other in doing good. They will have amity for
each other and they will help the Government. Their political ambitions can be
realized through the Congress alone whether they are in the Congress or not. If
the Congress thinks only of those who are in the Congress it will become very
narrow in its sphere of service. Even today there are very few people in the
Congress. If no other organization can
rival the Congress it is because the Congress has been trying to represent the
whole of India, because it has dedicated itself to the service of the poorest
and the lowliest.
[From Hindi] Prarthana
Pravachan- 11, pp. 229-32