Battle for the Soul of India BY PREM SHANKAR JHA
The common thread that runs through these attacks is a casual disregard for the truth, and a willingness to use any lie, any rumour, any prejudice, any person and any means to serve the higher purpose of converting India into a Hindu State... More than anything else it is the Sangh Parivar’s total lack of concern at being caught lying that reveals the depth of the danger that Indian democracy faces, for it shows that facts no longer matter. Only myths matter because, with executive power already in its hands, these are all the BJP/RSS needs to persuade the army and the police, even large parts of the judiciary, to do its bidding...
What began on February
9 as a small protest meeting at JNU to mark the hanging of Afzal Guru has
ballooned into a struggle that is without precedent in the country’s history.
This is not the first nationwide polarisation we have seen. Remember the
debate over the Indo-US nuclear deal? Or Anna Hazare’s fasts unto death over
the Lokpal Bill in 2011? But this polarisation is different. Those had occurred
over what India should do, but this is over what India should be.
The struggle that has begun now is over defining the soul of India.
For sixty nine years
India has defined itself as a pluralist, secular, ethnically heterogeneous
country that has built its nationhood by accommodating diversity. This is
now being challenged in earnest by the BJP or, to be more precise, the RSS,
(the distinction between the two that was so sharp in Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s
years has all but disappeared). The RSS has begun to fear that far from staying
in power for ten years, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi had confidently
predicted shortly after the 2014 elections, the BJP may well lose its majority
in 2019. This has left it far too little time to implement its long
cherished agenda for uprooting India from its pluralist-secular moorings and
turning it into a “Hindu Nation”.
Its fears might run
even deeper for after its shock defeats in Delhi and Bihar, it cannot be
unaware that it may meet the same fate in Punjab and UP next year as the
consolidation of the opposition that took place in Bihar is likely to be
repeated there too. Those defeats, were they to take place, would turn the Modi
government into a lame duck administration for the next two years. This is a
possibility that the Sangh Parivar does not seem willing to contemplate.
The many attacks
How high the stakes
for it are is revealed by how far it is prepared to go. Conspiracy theories
should be treated with great scepticism, but everything that has happened since
February 9 has the stamp of premeditation. When the Union Home Ministry decided
to arrest
JNU Students’ Union (JNSU) leader Kanhaiya Kumar on charges of
sedition after four full days to search for seditious matter in his 23-minute
address to JNUSU, it did so on the basis of a single Zee TV video clip
aired on February 10 that purported to show that students at the meeting
had shouted ‘Pakistan zindabad’ slogans. Last week a
magistrate’s court ruled, on the basis of a forensic examination, that the tape
was a fake and that the words Kumar was shown to have been spoken had
been pasted on from another sound track.
This immediately
raises the question about who doctored the tape? If someone was prepared to go
so far, can we be sure that the pro-Pakistan slogans at the February 9
afternoon meeting had also not been planted? Can we even be sure any longer
that the entire fracas at JNU was created not by Kashmiris from outside JNU, as
presumed by Harshit Agarwal, an uninvolved third year student who posted
a video of the entire meeting on the web, but an ABVP ‘false flag’
operation from the outset?
Undaunted by this
setback the RSS has hit back through its newly discovered star orator, Human
Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani. On the day after Kumar gave his
second speech in defence of democracy, the constitution, the rule of law, and
the freedom of speech and thought, Irani counterattacked by
turning the defence of her government over the death of Dalit scholar Rohith
Vemula in Hyderabad into a wholesale attack on anti-national and leftist
elements, accusing Vemula’s fellow students of deliberately preventing the
police from cutting down his body as he hung from the ceiling fan, and
preventing doctors from seeing him for a full 12 hours, in order to ensure his
martyrdom for their cause.
Her vitriolic speech
went viral on the internet and Modi hailed it with the two-word
tweet, ‘satyamev jayate’. Only a full 24 hours later did
Indians learn that everything
she said had been fabricated. Vemula’s family and friends said his body had
been cut down from the fan as soon as it was discovered, and that the chief
medical officer of the university had arrived within four minutes of receiving
the students’ call, had examined him and pronounced him dead. What’s more, as
the doctor said, when she examined him he had already been dead for several hours.
The police had not been prevented from seeing his corpse, much less from trying
to revive him.
But by then the Sangh
Parivar’s attack on ‘anti-national, left-wing, Muslim-loving,
pseudo-secularists’ was in full swing. While Kumar was in jail and his colleagues
in hiding, the Sangh Parivar had posted another video that purported to show
some JNU students yelling pro-Pakistan slogans during a clash
between them and the ABVP. But students at the university had already
recognised some of the slogan shouters as prominent members of the ABVP.
A few days later another
clip went up reporting that thousands of empty liquor bottles and used
condoms were recovered from JNU every day. And not perhaps by coincidence,
Chandan Mitra, the Oxford-educated editor of the BJP’s mouthpiece, The
Pioneer, sermonised that the time
had come to close down JNU altogether.
The common thread that
runs through these attacks is a casual disregard for the truth, and a
willingness to use any lie, any rumour, any prejudice, any person and any means
to serve the higher purpose of converting India into a Hindu State. Irani
claimed that everything she had said in parliament was from the Hyderabad
police report. But a comparison of what she said with what appeared in the
report shows that she saw only what she wanted to see and filled in the blanks
from her preconceptions.
Pervasive hyper-nationalism
More than anything
else it is the Sangh Parivar’s total lack of concern at being caught lying that
reveals the depth of the danger that Indian democracy faces, for it shows that
facts no longer matter. Only myths matter because, with executive power already
in its hands, these are all the BJP/RSS needs to persuade the army and
the police, even large parts of the judiciary, to do its bidding.
To say this is not to
imply that the army, the judiciary or the police, will not demur if asked to
enforce another Emergency. But their minds are being systematically prepared.
The danger that they could be asked to do so is therefore too real to ignore.
How deeply the appeals
to hyper-nationalism have resonated within the power structure of the country
is reflected
in the judgement handed down by Delhi high court Judge Pratibha Rani while
granting bail to Kumar. Prefacing her judgement with a patriotic song she made
it clear that she was granting bail only because the defendant was unlikely to
abscond or be able to obstruct the dispensation of justice. But he had
associated himself with unpatriotic slogans and actions, and needed to be
educated in nationalism. What is more, she opined that mild doses of
anti-nationalism should be treated through education. More severe cases may
need surgical excision, as becomes necessary with gangrene.
Nowhere did this
learned judge elaborate what constituted anti-national behaviour. Nor did she
explain what she meant by the chilling word ‘surgery’. What she did not bother
to hide was her virtual direction to a lower court that it should find Kumar
guilty of sedition ‘for his own good’. Days later, while
admitting a criminal defamation case against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind
Kejriwal, a district judge made ex cathedra remarks that have all but
pronounced him and five other Aam Aadmi Party leaders guilty without the
benefit of a trial.
If this is the
resonance that the BJP/RSS’s campaign can create in a judge of the Delhi high
court, what is it creating in the middle class? Internet provides us with
a crude yardstick. Till last Wednesday noon Kumar’s post-bail speech had
received 884,000 hits, while Irani’s speech in parliament had received 3.6
million hits. As for the Hyderabad chief medical officer’s testimony
demolishing Irani, forget the TV anchors, even I have difficulty remembering
her name. Kumar’s battle cry
that the fate of India lies in the hands of its poor and oppressed may turn out
to be more true than even he has bargained for.
See also
Sampradayikta Virodhi Andolan :Documents
People's Alliance for Democracy and Secularism - An Appeal to Democratic Citizens and Organisations of India
Kashmir Oral History
Mubashir Mir - Between Sanghi & Separatists: an alternate perspective from Kashmir
Mubashir Mir - Between Sanghi & Separatists: an alternate perspective from Kashmir
