Irfan Gul - What Kashmir needs is dialogue and non-violent discourse
This video, excerpted from a speech given by a
former stone-pelter, Irfan Gull, acquires greater significance today in light
of sudden rise in militant activities in Kashmir and after the events at
Jawaharlal Nehru University, where apparently a few young Kashmiris, with their
faces covered, shouted provocative slogans against India and then vanished. This
video is not only an exposé of how Kashmir’s youth are manipulated but also an
honestly told story, a realisation based on experience, an expression of
moderation, a confession, and, above all, an appeal to all sections of people –
for introspection, dialogue and resolution of the Kashmir problem through
understanding and non-violent discourse.
The historic
importance of this video may be seen in light of many Kashmiri people’s
experiences in Kashmir, where free expression of one’s political disagreement
with the dominant discourse is fraught with grave risks to life. Irfan Gull, a
young Kashmiri student, has taken a great risk and shown courage in
articulating his heart-felt thoughts.
This is a 12-minute,
edited and subtitled version of the 34-minute long speech and the question
answer session that followed.
The transcript of the full un-edited speech in
Irfan Gul’s own words is given below:
On February 14, 2016,
a seminar was held in Srinagar, I was invited to express my views. The title of
the seminar was: “Has gun proven to be the enemy of Kashmir? Will violence
achieve anything?” And this was my speech:
I am feeling honoured
that I have been given an opportunity to express my viewpoint about this
subject. Kashmir dispute is one of the determining factors for the stability of
the subcontinent. It is a complex Issue, which may take time to get resolved. We
will strive for its solution but at the same time we need to keep in mind that
we have to survive as well.
Being concerned
citizens, we must give space and respect to everyone’s views – so let us have a
debate of ideas rather than a battle of bullets. It is neither the question of
“integral part” [as India maintains] nor the “jugular vein” [as Pakistan
argued] but it is the struggle for dignity which finally will culminate in
emancipation from miseries.
Life as a protester:
I was involved in stone pelting,
fighting against Indian forces, but later I drew some lessons from those years
of my stone pelting which I believe was not in the good interests of common
people of Kashmir. When Amarnath land row started in 2008, I was in class 10. I
was active in that agitation and was organising and mobilising people from my
village and its adjacent areas for protests and demonstrations in Kulgam. We
were using loudspeakers and other mediums for it, which I realised was either
immaturity or some instability which hits every concerned youth of the valley.
I grew up in the
village which was known as the hotbed of resistance in Kulgam. I noticed that I
was being glorified and, perhaps instigated. People used to call me a jihadi
and say, “You will go to heaven” and so many such things. When late Sheikh
Abdul Aziz sahib was killed, we gathered people and went to Pampore for his
funeral prayers and also joined rallies at TRC and Eidgah. Finally the day came
when it was announced that the lease order [granted for Somnath Yatra] was
cancelled.
The sense of victory
not only delighted us but was a ray of hope as it was after long time we gave
up violence and hit the streets in a mass movement. It was the stage where
every Kashmiri was proud of the people’s movement rather than the barrels of
guns. Later on, we again failed to shape the real resistance movement which not
only hurts me personally but also made me think that we need to have a concrete
analysis of society.
To be honest I must
tell you frankly that our whole political spectrum is in wayward direction:
They don’t have any concrete analysis of this dispute. Some view it as a
complete religious battle between Hindus and Muslims, some view it as a battle
of India and Pakistan, and accordingly they will have their own sides.
Hijacked movement: Then life returned to normalcy (normalcy by
Kashmiri standards). Now it was time for Assembly elections. We again started
our mission, pelting stones at every political party except one party. I asked
my friends, “Why are we not supposed to pelt stones today?” One among them
said, “This is our own party”!
It was shocking. I
don’t need to praise mainstream parties as you all know the electoral leaders
consider themselves to be the epitome of honesty and integrity, which they are
not. Actually, they are also responsible for every brutality as well.
In 2009, again, we
started the same thing, a protest against Asiya and Neelofar’s rape and murder
[widely known as the Shopian rape and murder case]. Later, it was confined to
Shopian only, and we couldn’t achieve anything. In 2010, again, I was studying
in KGP Gogi Bagh and we were pelting stones at Rambagh and Natipora area of
Srinagar. And we all know what happened in 2010. Hundreds were killed. But
again we couldn’t achieve anything.
Then I started
thinking seriously that we are losing a life every day. We lost so many lives
and faced economic and educational loss as well. Why doesn’t international
community talk about us? I understood that our movement is hijacked – it is not
a religions fight with India but a political one. India brands our resistance
as a communal one, and it is true that it is gradually being influenced by
fundamentalist elements who have made it into a religious movement, which is
detrimental for the movement.
After that I started
talking with some friends that here is a problem with us and telling the people
that we need to do things this way, by all this we – the people – are at the
receiving end, not India or Pakistan. Then I started posting on Facebook which
was my platform and started meeting friends from all the regions of this part
of Jammu and Kashmir, learning from their experiences in life.
And then some months
back I thought that since I am working on the ground, I must write to the
newspapers as well on some untold stories of Kashmir history and give direction
to my anger through the use of pen instead of stone or gun. As per my little
experience, I have got to understand that we need to make people aware about
how we can achieve our goals, we need to unite people of all regions to get our
issues solved.
Speak-up against
injustice: If one wants to
work for better society, he or she must be fair in calling a spade a spade.
Injustice to anyone by anyone is condemnable and we must speak up against every
injustice irrespective of religion, region, caste, language, sex etcetera.
It is known to all
that India cheated us right from 1953, when then Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah
was unseated and then change of nomenclature of sadar-i-riyasat to
governor and Prime Minister to Chief Minister in 1965. The year 1984 was the
turning point for the insurgency, when India toppled elected government by
organising defection through the then governor Jagmohan. Then again rigging of
elections in 1987 proved to be the last nail in the coffin.
These may not be all
the reasons for the eruption of violence in Kashmir but these are the main and
substantial reasons for it. Vitiating the essence of Article 370 and then
legitimising that erosion by the brute [state] power is one of the reasons of
dissent, which further alienated [Kashmiris] and then turned into hatred. The
brutality unleashed by the counter insurgency agencies in terms of civilian
killings, rape, torture etcetera, created havoc in Jammu and Kashmir as that
was worst form of state terrorism. Even denial of Kunan
Poshpora.
If we believe Arif
Jamal, a Pakistani journalist, his book Shadow War: The Untold Story of Jihad in Kashmir says it all. He says more than 7,000 gun men of one
pro-Azadi organisation, who were fighting against India, were killed by their
own people. Several hundreds were killed in fight between rebel groups, one
example is of Pulwama 1993. The pro-independence political leaders having
different opinion were eliminated, these included Dr Ahad Guru, Professor Abdul
Ahad Wailoo, Mirwaiz Farooq, Qazi Nissar and Ghulam Qadir Wani.
The gun is in total
control of ISI, whatever they wish they do that with it.
Kashmiri Pandits were
killed and forced to leave Kashmir, which is a blot on the movement – and what
did we get by that? Our movement got labeled as terrorist movement, a communal
moment and what not. So it is debatable whether the gun was relevant or not in
1990s, but I believe it is certainly not relevant now. What we need is a
pluralist movement of the people, which must include all the regions of the state.
It should be a revolutionary mass movement. Thank you
See also
The Broken Middle (on the 30th anniversary of 1984)
