FORUM: The Military in World History
This issue of World History Connected is
part of a continuing, informal, effort to bring more military history into
world history and more world history into military history. That project began
with the World History Association sponsored panel, "Topics in World
Military History" at the April 2014 Society of Military History in Kansas
City, Missouri and will continue with future panels at WHA and SMH meetings.
The essays in this issue lack
thematic unity beyond the general topic of military history but each of them
offers a useful point of entry for classroom use. Andrew De La Garza's essay on
the Mughal navy reveals that even non-Western historians writing about their
own cultures propagate inaccurate stereotypes and demonstrates the need to
include naval and maritime dimensions even of such quintessential land powers
as the Mughal Empire. Mark Moreno's contribution encourages treatment of the
liberal wars in the Americas and Europe in a single curriculum unit. Timothy
May, the leading Mongol military historian, presents the concept of the Mongol
era of globalization, which could readily form the basis of a curriculum unit,
and discusses the diffusion of military techniques within it. James Tallon's
essay on the wars of the last decade of Ottoman history offers an interesting
take on the problem of extending periodization and nomenclature across regional
and cultural lines.
European history presents the struggle between the Ottomans
and the Italians in Libya, the Balkan Wars, the First World War, and the wars
associated with the formation of the Republic of Turkey as a series of discrete
conflicts. From an Ottoman or Turkish perspective, they formed a single
continuous conflict. Richard DiNardo's essay explains the circumstances that
have led losers, not winners, to dominate the historiography of the
Peloponnesian War, the American Civil War, the Spanish Civil War, and World War
II in Europe, and the consequences for the mainstream historiography of those
conflicts. His discussion could form the basis of a classroom lesson on the
circumstances that lead to the development of historiographical traditions.
Douglas E. Streusand is Professor of International Relations at
the Marine Corps Command & Staff College in Quantico, Virginia & Adjunct
Professor at the Institute of World Politics, Washington, D.C. He has written
The Formation of Mughal Empire & The
Islamic Gunpowder Empires: Ottomans, Safavids, Mughals, & multiple chapters, article & reviews. He received his Ph.D. in Islamic
history from the University of Chicago.
Guest Editor: Douglas Streusand
|
|
by Andrew De La Garza
|
|
by Richard L. DiNardo
|
|
by James N. Tallon
|
|
by Timothy May
|
|
by E. Mark Moreno
|
|
Articles
|
|
by Sharika Crawford
|
|
by Howard Spodek
|
|
by John Maunu
|