Friday, March 21, 2014

Nesrine Malik - Saudi Arabia's human rights 'rebrand' is fooling no one

The latest reports of Saudi concessions on human rights might as well be called Operation Rebrand Saudi Arabia. Of 225 demands issued by the UN human rights council in 2013, the Saudi delegation conceded to 180. Over the past couple of days, Saudi representatives have been on BBC's Newsnight, CNN's Amanpour and other outlets billing this as a landmark step in the right direction, sanctioned by no less a person than the king himself.
However, look into the fine print and problems arise. There is a great deal of language that sounds like kicking the human rights can further down the road. Lots of "in principles" and "under reviews" and "holistic approaches".
First, however, the good news. Saudi Arabia has, "in principle", accepted one of the most comprehensive overhauls of its human rights system in history, conceding that aspects of law enforcement and regulation of political assembly and freedom of speech should be brought in line with international standards. This is an admission that there are serious problems, a rare acknowledgement from a country so characteristically precious about its internal affairs.
But what about women's rights? The right to drive and the male guardianship system? These are the totems of the country's backwardness in the international community. There is some strong, encouraging language about guardianship, where Saudi proposes "phasing out" the guardianship system altogether.
But, unsurprisingly, the language on the driving ban is a bit vaguer, mainly guaranteeing "women's rights to free travel". I felt slightly sorry for the Saudi representative on BBC Newsnight, who had come to the interview prepared to talk about all the splendid recommendations they had accepted, only to be interrupted by Paxman repeatedly asking him if women could now drive. The representative could not come up with a simple "yes".
It's not surprising that these moves are being greeted with scepticism. The report comes after some terrible press for the Saudi royal family, and the king in particular. One of the king's ex-wives has appealed to western media organisations to intercede in the case of her three daughters, allegedly virtually imprisoned in the royal compound by their father in Saudi Arabia.
There is also a disconnect between legislation and culture which slightly confounds the Saudi government even if it does follow through. Recently, the government went so far as to say that it would fine shops selling lingerie and other women's items that did not employ Saudi women. However the number of prospective employees that came forward was so low that many business owners went bankrupt, stuck between the government's muscular approach and Saudi culture's reluctance.
The rebranding is of course, part of a wider national repositioning. Saudi Arabia finds itself slightly at sea. It was a country that could happily go about its business knowing that it was both an indispensable ally to the west in the Arab world, and a regional economic and religious powerhouse, enjoying an avuncular relationship with the rest of the Arab world's dictators. But the volatility of the Arab Spring, Qatar's rise as a capricious Gulf neighbour that just wont play ball, and America's philosophical withdrawal from what it now sees as a confusing and unpredictable Arab world, have left Saudi Arabian policymakers scrambling to carve out a new place for the country. Not to mention Iran's demotion from regional arch villain. I mean, even Iranian women can drive.
On the whole, it appears that the dispensations the country has made most enthusiastically are minor ones, such as allowing NGOs to operate and ratifying covenants on economical, social and cultural rights. Bigger concessions, such as lifting the ban on driving and categorically setting a minimum age of consent for marriage, are absent. .. read more:
See also:

Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (Author of Second Message of Islam)also known as Ustaz Mahmoud Mohammed Taha, was a Sudanese religious thinker, leader, and trained engineer. He was executed for apostasy at the age of 76 by the regime of Gaafar Nimeiry(See his Court statement)
THE MODERATE MARTYR - A radically peaceful vision of Islam

Maryam Namazie: Defend Bangladesh's Bloggers

Tableeghi Jamaat members can knock at any door anywhere in the West. But Christian missionaries cannot proselytize the Muslim world

‘Freedom to criticize religion is a touchstone of free expression’ - Interview with Gilbert Achcar

 WOLE SOYINKA: Religion Against Humanity

IHEU Freedom of Thought Report 2013: Death penalty for atheism in 13 countries

Salman Rushdie - ON CENSORSHIP.

Taslima Nasreen - ‘Religion Is The Biggest Bane For Any Democracy’

Syed Badrul Ahsan calls for Taslima's return - Our writers, our moral parameters

New Age Islam Website Is Banned In Pakistan

Taksim, Convergence, and Secular Space // Turkey, the end of Islamism with a human face

Khaled Ahmed - A culture of haters

Khaled Ahmed - Rollback nations (NEWSWEEK PAKISTAN)

Interview with Karima Bennoune, author of 'Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here'

Woman filmmaker in Iran sentenced to 18 months in prison
Najam Sethi - Pakistan: Pluralism and tolerance
Unfortunately, attempts to rationalize and modernize our education system have continuously foundered on the rock of misplaced, conservative or politically motivated religious elements in society..Two such cases have caught headlines recently. The first is an attempt by Imran Khan's PTI government in KPK to undo the rational cleansing of the textbooks by the previous ANP government by reinserting nations of jihad and "Islamic" vice and virtue into the curricula. The second is an attempt by a section of the media to devalue the teaching of "comparative" religion in schools in which the values of relative compassion, mutual respect and human dignity common to all religions are emphasized

We are secular Muslims, and secular persons of Muslim societies. We are believers, doubters, and unbelievers, brought together by a great struggle, not between the West and Islam, but between the free and the unfree. // We affirm the inviolable freedom of the individual conscience. We believe in the equality of all human persons. // We insist upon the separation of religion from state and the observance of universal human rights. // We find traditions of liberty, rationality, and tolerance in the rich histories of pre-Islamic and Islamic societies. These values do not belong to the West or the East; they are the common moral heritage of humankind.  We see no colonialism, racism, or so-called "Islamaphobia" in submitting Islamic practices to criticism or condemnation when they violate human reason or rights...