Hegemony Changes Everything: Antonio Gramsci's theories of how the rich stay rich

On the night of November 8, 1926, policeman arrived at Gramsci’s apartment in Rome. Initially, he was sentenced to five years of “confined exile,” and began serving out his sentence on the island of Ustica. While there, Gramsci endeavored again to set up a cultural school. He offered lessons in history and literature, which were attended by his fellow inmates as well as some local inhabitants of the island... Gramsci then stood trial for higher crimes in Rome. There, the court sentenced him to over twenty years in prison for “planning to topple the regime and replace it with a government of soviets,” which, in all fairness, he was. It was during the trial that the prosecutor famously said of Gramsci, “For twenty years, we must stop this brain from functioning.”

JEAN-YVES FRÉTIGNÉ; TO LIVE IS TO RESIST: THE LIFE OF ANTONIO GRAMSCI

Reviewed by JENNIFER WILSON

The Italian communist Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) would argue that it was precisely through the proliferation of such norms in our culture - wherein the inequalities of capitalism appear natural, as “senso comune” (common sense) - that the ruling classes stay as such. This concept would become known as “cultural hegemony.” In his early writings for socialist newspapers like Avanti! and later in his Prison Notebooks, Gramsci analyzed folklore, serialized novels, theater, devotional literature  -anything he could get his hands on in the prison library - to search for the ways that capitalist logic appeared as a self-evident truth (not some secret hiding in a remodeled bathroom).

Accordingly, Gramsci approached the subject of taste with the same vigor that other Marxists reserved for political economy. He reserved special rancor for Eugène Sue’s popular novel The Mysteries of Paris (1842–1843). In the novel, a Prince Rodolphe metes out vigilante justice in Paris’s seedy underbelly. Gramsci said the French serial provided “the romantic setting in which the fascist mentality is formed,” since it presented social problems as something to be solved by a superhero figure rather than through class struggle. 

https://www.bookforum.com/print/2901/antonio-gramsci-s-theories-of-how-the-rich-stay-rich-24819


Dag Herbjørnsrud - The African Enlightenment


Book Review: Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism in India


Seamus Heaney’s Advice to the Young. BY MARIA POPOVA


Julia Kristava: Interpreting radical evil


Evil, framed. By SLAVENKA DRAKULIĆ


The best books on Hegel: recommended by Stephen Houlgate


Hegel and the mystical tradition: Interview with Glenn Magee. By Stanislav Panin


Paul Sagar - The last hollow laugh - Francis Fukuyama and 'The End of History’


Book review: The Government of Desire


A moment of moral and political nihilism: Theologian Adam Kotsko on our current crisis


Jon Henley: Rise of far right puts Dreyfus affair into spotlight in French election race


Stanley Rosen (1929-2014). A great philosopher passes


Mark Neocleous: Resisting Resilience


Society of the Spectacle / 'इमेज' - 'Image': A Poem on Deaths in the Age of Covid


Ralph Dumain - The Paranoia Papers: Selected Bibliography Theory of the (Un)Natural History of Social Paranoia


Book Review: Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia’s Golden Age from the Arab Conquest to Tamerlane


HITLER'S WORLD


Alexandre Koyré The Political Function of the Modern Lie


A Hunger Artist - by Franz Kafka (1922)

 

Albert Camus's “The Human Crisis” (March 28, 1946) - 'No cause justifies the murder of innocents'


Sam Dresser: How Camus and Sartre split up over the question of how to be free


The Almond Trees by Albert Camus


Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Albert Camus's lecture 'The Human Crisis', New York, March 1946. 'No cause justifies the murder of innocents'