UK government accused of 'putting profit before lives' in case aimed at stopping arms exports to Saudi Arabia

The government has been accused of “putting profit before people’s lives” ahead of the start of a High Court case aimed at stopping the UK from exporting arms to Saudi Arabia. The case is being brought by the group Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), which claims there is “overwhelming evidence” that British-made jets and bombs are being used by Saudi-led forces to violate international humanitarian law in Yemen.

CAAT says more than 10,000 people have been killed since a Saudi-led coalition began fighting Houthi rebels in 2015, and UK-made weapons have helped create “a humanitarian catastrophe”.
CAAT is being backed by other groups being represented at the hearing, including Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and Amnesty International, whose strategic litigation director Lucy Claridge said outside court: “It is time for the UK Government to stop putting profit before people's lives.

“By selling billions of pounds worth of arms to Saudi Arabia, ministers are signing a death warrant for the people of Yemen. "Across Europe, several countries have stopped selling arms to Saudi Arabia because they know it goes against their legal obligations and have seen the devastation they are causing.” CAAT is seeking to overturn a 2017 High Court ruling in which it was denied a judicial review of the weapons exports.  CAAT had argued the government was breaching its own export licensing rules, which prevent sales when there is “a clear risk that the arms might be used in the commission of a serious violation of international humanitarian law”.

Posts on Khashoggi murder

But the 2017 judges said the issue of arms sales to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen “was the subject of intense, genuine concern and debate” by government officials who had better access to information than NGOs. Secret evidence played a significant part in the 2017 case and the court delivered a closed judgment as well as a public ruling. In their public ruling, the judges acknowledged that in one February 2016 email, senior civil servant Edward Bell said he had briefed Sajid Javid, then the minister in charge of trade, to the effect that: “My gut tells me we should suspend [the arms sales]. This would be prudent and cautious given the acknowledged gaps in knowledge about Saudi operations.”.. read more:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-arms-sales-saudi-arabia-yemen-legal-case-high-court-bombing-weapons-trade-human-rights-violations-a8861471.html

see also




Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Goodbye Sadiq al-Azm, lone Syrian Marxist against the Assad regime