Bharat Bhushan - Rafale deal row: Why procedure should be seen as no less crucial than price

By Dilip -
Why procedure should be seen as no less crucial than price  Both CAG and Parliament should closely examine the processes of decision-making; should they fail in this regard, it would be open to public-spirited citizens to file a petition in the courts 


The Rafale fighter jet deal controversy is unlikely to die down in the run up to the general elections. The Opposition has already questioned the price of the deal and the secrecy clause, and made charges of crony capitalism. There is an oblique suggestion of kickbacks involved. Normally such allegations would be par for the course in any lively democracy. So would the privilege motion moved in the Lok Sabha by the Congress party against the Prime Minister and the Minister for Defence. However, the defence minister’s over-the-top reaction during the no-confidence debate prompted several observers to wonder whether “the lady doth protest too much”.

Despite the furore over the past two weeks, several significant issues of procedure need to be addressed in public and in Parliament. The first question to ask for such a large deal would be: When did the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) clear it? It is the CCS which deals with capital expenditure of more than Rs 10 billion in defence-related purchases and projects. At 7.87 billion euros (over Rs 580 billion), this deal was valued several times over that limit. A Cabinet note would have been moved for clearance by the CCS and the Cabinet.

The government must clarify when this was done and whether the CCS decision was taken before the Prime Minister announced the deal in Paris on April 10, 2015. It might be argued that an earlier Cabinet sanction was already operative since India and France had been in negotiations for three years for the purchase of 126 Rafale fighter jets. However, the earlier deal for 126 aircraft was valued at Rs 7.15 billion per aircraft. On the other hand, the 36 Rafale aircraft bought by the Modi government were valued at Rs 16 billion per aircraft. The newly purchased aircraft are said to include elements not available in the earlier ones. Under these circumstances, it is open to question whether the purchase can be judged as price escalation or as a new deal altogether. In case of price escalation, the government’s “Transaction of Business Rules” (TBR) say that if escalation is more than 20 per cent, then the new capital expenditure proposal has to go back to the CCS for approval. Was this approval sought and given before April 10, 2015? The French defence ministry, for its part, told Reuters that this was a new deal. 

For clearance as a new deal it should have gone to the CCS based on a proposal mooted by the defence ministry after Inter-ministerial consultation. This would mean consulting the finance ministry for the financial outgo and perhaps other ministries such as the Ministry of External Affairs. After consultations, the Cabinet Note would have been moved by the then defence secretary through the then Cabinet secretary. This is the laid out procedure. The Modi government should reveal the timeline of these steps to show that due procedure was followed.

The government, however, can also follow an alternative procedure. Let us assume that there was no prior approval of the CCS and that it was decided on the eve of the prime minister’s departure to France that the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets was the high-profile deliverable which would make the visit a success. In that case, after having announced the deal from Paris, a retrospective CCS and Cabinet approval would have been sought. In this scenario, Rule 12 of the TBR would have to be invoked for the “impulse buying” of the jets and seek the Cabinet’s approval ex post facto. Rule 12 allows that, “The Prime Minister may, in any case or classes of cases permit or condone a departure from these rules, to the extent he deems necessary.”

Since Rule 12 modifies the normal process of examination and inter-ministerial consultation, it is invoked by Prime Ministers only under situations of extreme urgency or unforeseen contingency, such as war. In this scenario, the proposal by the defence ministry should have given the justification for the urgency and listed the exceptional circumstances prevailing. The approval of the defence minister, Manohar Parrikar at the time, would be needed before sending the retrospective clearance proposal to the Cabinet.

Clearly, any circumvention of the TBR is permissible only when a reasoned argument for bypassing the Rules is put on record. The government should be prepared to justify its action in Parliament and share it with its auditors. The TBR follows from Article 77 (3) of the Constitution of India. Even a Prime Minister must record on file why he took a decision circumventing the Rules and if seeking ex-post facto Cabinet approval, the department concerned must justify the urgent and exceptional circumstances necessitating the circumvention of established procedure. 

If indeed Prime Minister Modi bypassed the collective decision-making process, are his reasons on record? It would be interesting to know how far the PM overstepped into areas of decision making that are the provenance of the defence minister. Under the “Allocation of Business Rules” of the government, “procurement exclusive to the Defence services” comes under the sole remit of the defence ministry. Some press reports which appeared at the time suggested that the Rafale decision came as a surprise to Defence Minister Parrikar. He was apparently on his way to the airport to take flight to Goa when he was called to the Prime Minister’s Office and informed of the purchase decision by the Prime Minister.

It must also be appreciated that government-to-government deals are not necessarily better than open commercial deals. Soviet-era defence deals and even those with Russia are examples of opaque government-to-government deals where rent seekers can have a field day. They allow the actors to hide behind secrecy clauses, lack transparency and confound the process of accountability.

Both the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) and Parliament should closely examine these processes of decision-making. They are no less important than the price of the jet fighters or the charges of crony capitalism. Should they fail in this regard, it would be open to public spirited citizens to file a petition in the courts.
https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/rafale-deal-row-why-procedure-should-be-seen-as-no-less-crucial-than-price-118073000181_1.html


Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

By Dilip -
The People’s Union for Democratic Rights on Tuesday alleged that third degree torture methods were used by the Gurgaon Criminal Investigation Agency while interrogating workers of Maruti Suzuki India Limited’s Manesar plant who are accused of involvement in the killing of an HR manager and the violent attack at the plant on July 18. The PUDR alleged that the Gurgaon CIA investigation “did not seem” to be directed at solving the crime or probing the involvement of the arrested workers in the incidents and crimes recorded in the FIR but instead was based on their involvement in trade union activities. Grave doubts  “The use of third degree torture in police custody, and the securing of arrestees’ signatures on blank papers by the police, gives rise to grave doubts regarding the ability of such an investigation in effectively identifying or arresting those guilty. The police and the State seem keener to reassure Maruti Suzuki Ltd. and ensure that production continues,” the PUDR stat
Read more

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

By Dilip -
According to Murakami, “1Q84” is just an amplification of one of his most popular short stories,   which (in its English version) is five pages long. “Basically, it’s the same,” he told me. “A boy meets a girl. They have separated and are looking for each other. It’s a simple story. I just made it long.” One beautiful April morning, on a narrow side street in Tokyo's fashionable Harujuku neighborhood, I walked past the 100% perfect girl. Tell you the truth, she's not that good-looking. She doesn't stand out in any way. Her clothes are nothing special. The back of her hair is still bent out of shape from sleep. She isn't young, either - must be near thirty, not even close to a "girl," properly speaking. But still, I know from fifty yards away: She's the 100% perfect girl for me. The moment I see her, there's a rumbling in my chest, and my mouth is as dry as a desert..." read the story: http://www.youmightfindyourself.com/post/22131227
Read more

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

By Dilip -
Image
'Do you know', Napoleon once said to Fontanes, 'what astounds me most about the world?  The impotence of force to establish anything.  There are only two powers in the world: the sword and the mind.  In the end, the sword is always conquered by the mind' Conquerors, you see, are sometimes melancholy.  They have to pay some price for so much vainglory. But what a hundred years ago was true of the sword is no longer true today of the tank. Conquerors have made progress, and the dismal silence of places without intelligence has been established for years at a time in a lacerated Europe. At the time of the hideous wars of Flanders, Dutch painters could still perhaps paint the cockerels in their farmyards. The Hundred Years War has likewise been forgotten, and yet the prayers of Silesian mystics still linger in some hearts. But today, things have changed; the painter and the monk have been drafted - we are one with the world.  The mind has lost that regal certainty which a c
Read more

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

By Dilip -
Mother of Cities to me, For I was born in her gate, Between the palms and the sea, Where the world-end steamers wait  Rudyard Kipling , To the City of Bombay "Few people who have criticized England from the inside have said bitterer things about her than this gutter patriot" : George Orwell IT WAS a pity that Mr. Eliot should be so much on the defensive in the long essay with which he prefaces this selection of Kipling's poetry, but it was not to be avoided, because before one can even speak about Kipling one has to clear away a legend that has been created by two sets of people who have not read his works. Kipling is in the peculiar position of having been a byword for fifty years. During five literary generations every enlightened person has despised him, and at the end of that time nine-tenths of those enlightened persons are forgotten and Kipling is in some sense still there. Mr. Eliot never satisfactorily explains this fact, because in answering the shal
Read more

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

By Dilip -
NB: This is the text of my address to the Eighth East-West Inter-cultural Relations Conference held at Ramjas College, the University of Delhi, on March 17.  The details of the conference may be read here . A pdf file of the address is downloadable here  -  DS Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism Dilip Simeon Keynote address to the Eighth East-West Inter-cultural Relations Conference Ramjas College, March 17-18 2016 Zilu stopped for the night at Stone Gate. The gatekeeper said, Where are you from? Zilu said, From the household of Confucius. The gatekeeper said, The one who knows there’s nothing that can be done but keeps on trying?  -  from the Analects of Confucius (14:40) What is truth? asked jesting Pilate, and would not stay for an answer – Francis Bacon In fact it is more correct to say Truth is God than to say God is Truth – Mohandas Gandhi Introduction: The human being is the speaking animal, the discerner of good and evil. This featur
Read more

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

By Dilip -
Image
In  Asia Minor or in Alexandria, in the second century of our faith (when Basilides was announcing that the cosmos was a rash and malevolent improvisation engineered by defective angels), Nils Runeberg might have directed, with a singular intellectual passion, one of the Gnostic monasteries. Dante would have destined him, perhaps, for a fiery sepulcher; his name might have augmented the catalogues of heresiarchs, between Satornibus and Carpocrates; some fragment of his preaching, embellished with invective, might have been preserved in the apocryphal Liber adversus omnes haereses  or might have perished when the firing of a monastic library consumed the last example of the  Syntagma . Instead, God assigned him to the twentieth century, and to the university city of Lund. There, in 1904, he published the first edition of  Kristus och Judas ; there, in 1909, his masterpiece  Dem hemlige Frälsaren  appeared. (Of this last mentioned work there exists a German version,  Der heimliche Heilan
Read more

Goodbye Sadiq al-Azm, lone Syrian Marxist against the Assad regime

By Dilip -
NB:  An interesting obituary to a great intellectual. My knowledge of the situation is limited, but as regards this article,  I'm uncomfortable with the argument that there should be no objection to the participation  of communal parties  in a democratic alliance. My views on this are conditioned by the history of religion-based mobilisations in India, where the communist movement has from time to time allied with communal groups of all colours, with disastrous consequences. Some material on this theme may be read here .  Nor can I agree that Islamists, Hindutva groups or Khalistanis etc. can be described as 'religious parties'. I do not mean to justify alliances with 'secular' tyrants, but to remind anyone who cares to listen, that communalism is also an expression of tyranny.  Communalists proceed on the assumption that membership of a religious community automatically produces a political interest, and strive to create that interest. They enter democratic move
Read more