Is it true that 93 per cent of Malaysia’s women are “circumcised” and that Malaysia’s highest religious authority issued a fatwa in 2009 requiring the “cutting” of all Muslim women? This appeared in Pakistan’s The Express Tribune (February 20, 2015) and is difficult to digest. But a cousin of mine, who was once quite normal living here in Lahore but has gone nuts after becoming a British citizen in Liverpool, has written to tell me that Islam actually allows female genital mutilation.
Years ago, Malaysia’s great leader Mahathir bin Mohamad told us in Lahore that his country couldn’t afford to follow Pakistan in imposing primitive hudood laws that reduced the testimony of non-Muslims and women to half. Today, Malaysian PM Najib Razak says his country is moderately Islamic. But others say he is letting the state go hard-shell Islamic because the Islamist elements in his party are too strong. And he has used the country’s notorious sedition act to jail his opponents because they reject hudood.
If Malaysia goes down this familiar road, it will lose some basic attributes of the modern nation-state and will be of a piece with the rest of the Muslim world. Ironically, nation-states lose the “nation” part after “expelling” minority elements — and, somehow, women. Primitive minds equate a nation with one identity. This has happened to Pakistan. The Balkan region first did this, with its nationalists saying the “state periodically expels its trash”.
Is it “Muslim trash” we see in the states Muslims created as nation-states, getting the word “nation” all wrong? Somehow women get a raw deal in this process of removing minorities from the “nation”. Is Malaysia moving to where Pakistan, and possibly Bangladesh, have already got? What appears to be Islamic reform in Malaysia now will ultimately get the Chinese and Indians expelled like “trash”. Pakistan under Zulfikar Ali Bhutto too did this in 1974, on the pretext of purifying the Muslim identity. Today, it is increasingly a state without a nation.
In The Ahmadis and the Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan (2015), Ali Usman Qasmi reveals what may compare to what Najib Razak is going through — Bhutto got parliament to apostatise Ahmadi Muslims. He was driven, like Razak, by a strange internal impulse Muslims ultimately succumb to. Today, Pakistan is killing Shias, the next “trash” the state wants to expel. What Nusrat Bhutto grasped intuitively about Pakistan’s future was missed by a left-leaning Bhutto in his obsession with the nation-state as he understood it. Today, Shias are being slaughtered while other “trash” Muslims, like the Ismailis, are next in line. Non-Muslims are targeted by the blasphemy law. Those who can run away are leaving Pakistan. Those who can’t are the victims of a state expelling its “trash”.
In Bangladesh, a secular Sheikh Hasina Wajed is ruling a state gone crazy about Islam. Some say a Salafist fundamentalism funded from abroad has caused Bangladeshi society to become intolerant, but the fact is that the state of Bangladesh had started expelling its “trash” soon after its “liberation” from Pakistan. Mujibur Rahman couldn’t stop the expulsion of Hindus and couldn’t restore the properties grabbed from them by Muslims.
Today, an Islamised Bangladesh is fast becoming a state without a nation. In the Middle East, Muslim states, artificial imperial impositions, should have become nations after living together for half a century. The West’s “democracy evangelism” has picked them apart. Iraq, says Fareed Zakaria, is no longer a state. Once, Kemalist Turkey was the model. M.A. Jinnah kept Mustafa Kemal’s biography under his pillow; Allama Iqbal thought secular Turkey was the new model for Muslims.
Today, an angry Turk called Recep Tayyip Erdogan is leading the nation back to where communities have to suffer to allow the state to cleanse itself. I thought there were no Shias in Egypt, but now the news is, Egyptians find them and thrash them for being “different”. The Muslim faith has reasserted itself and wants to remain unchanging, even as the modern state mutates in order to survive. In Africa and the Middle East, Muslims are not able to cope with change. Now, the Muslims of Malaysia and Indonesia might get pulled into this new crisis.
The writer is consulting editor, ‘Newsweek
More articles on Pakistan
Popular posts from this blog
According to Murakami, “1Q84” is just an amplification of one of his most popular short stories, which (in its English version) is five pages long. “Basically, it’s the same,” he told me. “A boy meets a girl. They have separated and are looking for each other. It’s a simple story. I just made it long.” One beautiful April morning, on a narrow side street in Tokyo's fashionable Harujuku neighborhood, I walked past the 100% perfect girl. Tell you the truth, she's not that good-looking. She doesn't stand out in any way. Her clothes are nothing special. The back of her hair is still bent out of shape from sleep. She isn't young, either - must be near thirty, not even close to a "girl," properly speaking. But still, I know from fifty yards away: She's the 100% perfect girl for me. The moment I see her, there's a rumbling in my chest, and my mouth is as dry as a desert..." read the story: http://www.youmightfindyourself.com/post/22131227
'Do you know', Napoleon once said to Fontanes, 'what astounds me most about the world? The impotence of force to establish anything. There are only two powers in the world: the sword and the mind. In the end, the sword is always conquered by the mind' Conquerors, you see, are sometimes melancholy. They have to pay some price for so much vainglory. But what a hundred years ago was true of the sword is no longer true today of the tank. Conquerors have made progress, and the dismal silence of places without intelligence has been established for years at a time in a lacerated Europe. At the time of the hideous wars of Flanders, Dutch painters could still perhaps paint the cockerels in their farmyards. The Hundred Years War has likewise been forgotten, and yet the prayers of Silesian mystics still linger in some hearts. But today, things have changed; the painter and the monk have been drafted - we are one with the world. The mind has lost that regal certainty which a c
NB: This is the text of my address to the Eighth East-West Inter-cultural Relations Conference held at Ramjas College, the University of Delhi, on March 17. The details of the conference may be read here . A pdf file of the address is downloadable here - DS Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism Dilip Simeon Keynote address to the Eighth East-West Inter-cultural Relations Conference Ramjas College, March 17-18 2016 Zilu stopped for the night at Stone Gate. The gatekeeper said, Where are you from? Zilu said, From the household of Confucius. The gatekeeper said, The one who knows there’s nothing that can be done but keeps on trying? - from the Analects of Confucius (14:40) What is truth? asked jesting Pilate, and would not stay for an answer – Francis Bacon In fact it is more correct to say Truth is God than to say God is Truth – Mohandas Gandhi Introduction: The human being is the speaking animal, the discerner of good and evil. This featur
Mother of Cities to me, For I was born in her gate, Between the palms and the sea, Where the world-end steamers wait Rudyard Kipling , To the City of Bombay "Few people who have criticized England from the inside have said bitterer things about her than this gutter patriot" : George Orwell IT WAS a pity that Mr. Eliot should be so much on the defensive in the long essay with which he prefaces this selection of Kipling's poetry, but it was not to be avoided, because before one can even speak about Kipling one has to clear away a legend that has been created by two sets of people who have not read his works. Kipling is in the peculiar position of having been a byword for fifty years. During five literary generations every enlightened person has despised him, and at the end of that time nine-tenths of those enlightened persons are forgotten and Kipling is in some sense still there. Mr. Eliot never satisfactorily explains this fact, because in answering the shal
Twenty years ago—on November 25, 1994—Isaiah Berlin accepted the honorary degree of Doctor of Laws at the University of Toronto. He prepared the following “short credo” (as he called it in a letter to a friend) for the ceremony, at which it was read on his behalf. “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.” With these words Dickens began his famous novel A Tale of Two Cities . But this cannot, alas, be said about our own terrible century. Men have for millennia destroyed each other, but the deeds of Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Napoleon (who introduced mass killings in war), even the Armenian massacres, pale into insignificance before the Russian Revolution and its aftermath: the oppression, torture, murder which can be laid at the doors of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, and the systematic falsification of information which prevented knowledge of these horrors for years—these are unparalleled. They were not natural disasters, but preventable human crimes, and what
NB: An interesting obituary to a great intellectual. My knowledge of the situation is limited, but as regards this article, I'm uncomfortable with the argument that there should be no objection to the participation of communal parties in a democratic alliance. My views on this are conditioned by the history of religion-based mobilisations in India, where the communist movement has from time to time allied with communal groups of all colours, with disastrous consequences. Some material on this theme may be read here . Nor can I agree that Islamists, Hindutva groups or Khalistanis etc. can be described as 'religious parties'. I do not mean to justify alliances with 'secular' tyrants, but to remind anyone who cares to listen, that communalism is also an expression of tyranny. Communalists proceed on the assumption that membership of a religious community automatically produces a political interest, and strive to create that interest. They enter democratic move
In Asia Minor or in Alexandria, in the second century of our faith (when Basilides was announcing that the cosmos was a rash and malevolent improvisation engineered by defective angels), Nils Runeberg might have directed, with a singular intellectual passion, one of the Gnostic monasteries. Dante would have destined him, perhaps, for a fiery sepulcher; his name might have augmented the catalogues of heresiarchs, between Satornibus and Carpocrates; some fragment of his preaching, embellished with invective, might have been preserved in the apocryphal Liber adversus omnes haereses or might have perished when the firing of a monastic library consumed the last example of the Syntagma . Instead, God assigned him to the twentieth century, and to the university city of Lund. There, in 1904, he published the first edition of Kristus och Judas ; there, in 1909, his masterpiece Dem hemlige Frälsaren appeared. (Of this last mentioned work there exists a German version, Der heimliche Heilan