Anjan Basu: What Can Karl Marx Offer to the 21st Century?

The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionising the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind... 

It is enough to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity…Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto (1848)

Religion is the general theory of this world, it's encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion. Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo: Karl MarxA Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (1843)

NB: May 5, 2022 is the 204th birth anniversary of Karl Marx, whose ghost still haunts the capitalist system. DS

Eric Hobsbawm, the well-known historian, recalls how George Soros once asked him about what Hobsbawm thought of Karl Marx. This was at the turn of the 21st century. Surprised, and also aware that there was hardly any meeting ground between the billionaire hedge-funds wizard and champion of the free market and a Marxist historian who refused to renounce his membership of the British Communist Party even when the party faced liquidation, Hobsbawm chose to give an ambiguous answer.

Soros’ rejoinder was startling. “That man,” he said, “discovered something about capitalism 150 years ago that we must take notice of.” Also, in 1998, as the Communist Manifesto turned 150, the editor of the inflight magazine of United Airlines (UA) approached Hobsbawm with a request that amazed the historian. Would he consent to UA using, for their magazine, portions of an article Hobsbawm had written to mark the anniversary, so that American (mostly business) travelers could acquaint themselves with what the Manifesto talked about?

But this curiosity about what Karl Marx wrote or stood for is more than matched by a frequent desire to pummel him no matter what. I remember watching a panel discussion on a prominent Bengali TV channel two or three years back. The subject at hand was of the chit fund scams that rocked the state just then….

https://thewire.in/history/what-can-karl-marx-offer-to-the-21st-century


Karl Marx: Letter to Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America; 1865


Book Review: Gandhi through a Marxian lens


Walter Benjamin: Capitalism as Religion (1921)


Noam Chomsky: Internationalism or Extinction (Universalizing Resistance)


Can Capitalism and Democracy Coexist?


Book Review - Karl Polanyi: What the Austro-Hungarian economic theorist tells us about the upheavals of our age


Pandora Papers: Suspect foreign money flows into booming American tax havens on promise of eternal secrecy


Lynn Parramore: The perverted dreams of western modernity and capitalism may be exhausting themselves


Former student leader Gabriel Boric to become Chile’s youngest president after beating far-right rival


Book review: Thomas Piketty's Capital and Ideology


Debt: The first five thousand years. By DAVID GRAEBER


Michael Roberts: The top 1% own 45% of all global personal wealth; the bottom 50% own less than 1% // Global Economic Volatility and Socio-Political Reactions


Noam Chomsky: Neoliberalism Is Destroying Our Democracy


Sam Kriss: 'Neoliberalism' isn't a left-wing insult but a monstrous system of inequality


George Monbiot: Ayn Rand - A Manifesto for Psychopaths


Marxism & the Jewish Question: Selected Bibliography


The Paranoia Papers: Theory of the (Un)Natural History of Social Paranoia: Selected Bibliography


What happened to democracy in 2020?


My Correct Views on Everything: Leszek Kolakowski's correspondence with E.P. Thompson


Tanya Gold - How materialism makes us sad


How capitalism created the post-truth society — and brought about its own undoing. By Keith Spencer


Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Rudyard Kipling: critical essay by George Orwell (1942)

Satyagraha - An answer to modern nihilism

Three Versions of Judas: Jorge Luis Borges

Albert Camus's lecture 'The Human Crisis', New York, March 1946. 'No cause justifies the murder of innocents'