Justin Sider: In Defense of Disinterested Knowledge
When we judge scholarship only as politics, something crucial is lost A new consensus unites college administrators with many of their faculty members, especially in the humanities: Scholarship today must be socially engaged. This demand, and the morally charged language that comes with it, might seem to meet the urgency of our political moment. But it has a deforming effect — on our teaching, on hiring and funding, and on our understanding of scholarship and the university itself.
In a recent
interview with The Chronicle Review, Feisal Mohamed
reveals the logic animating our current moralistic attitude. According to what
he suggests is the “American studies” model, whose influence extends far
outside of American studies proper, “if you’re not performing work explicitly
invested in some kind of social-justice mission, then you are advancing the
cause of settler-colonialism.” It’s disturbing, as Mohamed notes, to see a
“narrowing of humanistic learning” demanded by scholars themselves. What
happens under this new dispensation to those knowledge projects that can’t
easily be yoked to a vision of political action?
There always have been
debates about how we value scholarship, what sort of work deserves attention,
etc. — not only because there’s a limited amount of attention to go around, but
also because attention nominally translates into funding and hiring lines in
the garbage-compactor economy currently squeezing us to death. As the walls
close in, things heat up. Manifestos grow like mushrooms. And professors who
cannot properly lay claim to radical politics through their scholarly work find
themselves in an odd position….
https://www.chronicle.com/article/in-defense-of-disinterested-knowledge
Book review - Seeing reason: Jonathan Israel's radical vision
Graham
Harman - Between Truth and Power: Bruno Latour’s Political Philosophy
Interview:
Philosopher Bruno Latour on Challenges of Identity Politics in India
Maurice Blanchot : The Infinite
Conversation
Ravi Bhoothalingam: Coronavirus and the
Mandate of Heaven
Gastón Gordillo: Nazi Architecture As
Affective Weapon
Tanya
Gold - How materialism makes us sad
Beware
the destruction of the state! An interview with Timothy Snyder
Can Capitalism and Democracy Coexist?
Andrew
Calcutt: The surprising origins of ‘post-truth’ – and how it was spawned by the
liberal left
A
pre-history of post-truth, East and West. By MARCI SHORE
Michiko
Kakutani - The death of truth: how we gave up on facts and ended up with Trump
Farewell
to reality - WHY WE’RE POST-FACT by Peter Pomerantsev
How
capitalism created the post-truth society — and brought about its own undoing.
By Keith Spencer
Helen
Pluckrose: Postmodernism and its impact, explained
Why
can’t we agree on what’s true any more? By William Davies
Alexander Klein: The politics of logic