Zoe Williams - ‘Raw hatred’: why the 'incel' movement targets and terrorises women
When a van was driven
on to a Toronto pavement on Tuesday, killing 10 people and injuring 15, police
chief Mark Saunders said that, while the incident appeared to be a deliberate
act, there was no evidence of terrorism. The public safety minister Ralph Goodale
backed this up, deeming the event “not part of an
organised terror plot”. Canada has rules about these things: to count as
terrorism, the attacker must have a political, religious or social motivation,
something beyond “wanting to terrorise”.
Why have the
authorities been so fast to reject the idea of terrorism (taking as read that
this may change; the tragedy is very fresh)? Shortly before the attack, a post
appeared on the suspect’s Facebook profile, hailing the commencement of the
“Incel Rebellion”, including the line “Private (Recruit) … Infantry 00010,
wishing to speak to Sgt 4chan please. C23249161.” (“4chan is the main
organising platform for the ‘alt-right’,” explains Mike Wendling, the author
of Alt-Right:
from 4Chan to the White House.)
There is a reluctance
to ascribe to the “incel” movement anything so lofty as an “ideology” or credit
it with any developed, connected thinking, partly because it is so bizarre in
conception.
Standing for
“involuntarily celibate”, the term was originally invented 20 years ago by a
woman known only as Alana, who coined the term as a name for an online support
forum for singles, basically a lonely hearts club. “It feels like being the
scientist who figured out nuclear fission and then discovers it’s being used as
a weapon for war,” she says, describing the feeling of watching it mutate into
a Reddit muster
point for violent misogyny... read more:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/25/raw-hatred-why-incel-movement-targets-terrorises-women