Independence Day in Gorakhpur

Dear friends, readers of this blog
Today is the 70th anniversary of India’s independence. For the past many decades (despite my critical attitude) I have always defended the democratic values embodied in our constitution and the greatness of our independence movement. And I have been clear in my opposition to hatred and violence of all kinds, whether emanating from religious fanatics, ultra patriots, or revolutionary zeal.

But today I can only think of the dead babies of Gorakhpur. All the tall talk of political leaders makes me sick. Please see these photos of the tragedy in Gorakhpur, they are heartbreaking. Little children in the last hours of their lives, suffocating to death for no fault of theirs.

Rarely do public events make me weep, but when I saw these photographs I was so upset I couldn’t sleep. The last time this happened was over the death of the raped and murdered young woman Jyoti Singh Pandey in 2012. I wept for her. And this year, the judicial murder of the Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo moved me intensely. Those were the tragedies of two brave persons. But this tragedy defies comprehension. Seventy-two children dead, ranging from a few days old to their teens. 

More important than political issues is the philosophical question: How can God allow babies and little children to suffocate to death? What is the point of all our prayers to the Almighty? 

In the midst of this all that the Uttar Pradesh government and the hegemons of the BJP can do is to protect their  'image'! It is so typical of their ideologues to use the word ‘unfortunate’ to describe this enormity. And to ask ‘didn’t these things happen under the Congress’? They have even indulged in their favourite pastime of communal baiting of a doctor who happens to be Muslim. These people are heartless and shameless. What in Hindi we call maryadaheen. Their much vaunted patriotism is a deceitful diversion from their lust for power. If the followers and admirers of the RSS can set aside their partisanship for five minutes, can they please exercise what remains of their conscience and ask:

What would you have said if this took place under any other government?

This comment sums it up: It is not unfortunate, sir. It is a tragedy of monumental proportions. It is an unprecedented medical savagery and defies all logic. It is horrific... The Uttar Pradesh government has the blood of 60 children on its hands. The saffron robes of its chief minister are tainted with the blot of incompetence, insensitivity and, as Noble laureate Kailash Satyarthi rightly says, the massacre of infants. In any other country run by a sensitive and competent government, these children could have been easily saved. Because they did not die of a sudden calamity or in a tragic incident that could not have been averted… 

What is the use of a magisterial enquiry? What can the magistrate even do, bring the children back to life? For sheer brutal incompetence and indifference to human life, this is a world record. Granted that the children come from modest backgrounds and their parents have no clout. They can be told, "here take the bodies home. We are so sorry, but don't make a fuss, yeh hotha hai."

The 1980 filmed version of A Tale of Two Cities opens with the coach of a French nobleman running over a poor child and trampling it to death. The aristocrat inside the coach reacts with irritation at this minor nuisance. Before ordering his coachman to drive off, he throws a coin from his window at the bereaved father holding the little corpse in his arms.

The children of the poor are just dirt for these rulers. 
So was it in France in 1789. So it is in India today. 

Jai Hind

Dilip

PS - Here is a poem by a doctor:

Then they reached, seventy of them,
In shrouds as white as the lilies of the field.
They cried, they wailed, they gasped for air,
Their caring moms left behind.
A man with a skin made from light,
His gentle look and the magic wand.
He tried his best to make them smile,
His tricks failed, his magic wanting.
It all but failed to make them beam,
The little angels still searched for their moms.
And then there came a group as white as their shrouds,
A group led by an old man with no teeth.
He had no teeth but his smile was sweet,
As sweet as mother’s love.
His naked chest bore three holes, full of light,
White and soft, a light of hope. 
And along with him came an old lady,
Her wrinkled skin was clear like truth.
She wore a white sari with a blue border,
And they all called her mother.
The old man with a chest of light jested with the tiny angels,
And the mother put them to sleep, one by one.
She sang a lullaby from the years gone by,
And then the seventy of them slept in peace.
Their tiny chest not wanting for air,
Their cold hands not searching for moms.
In shrouds as white as the lilies of the field

- Shah Alam Khan

India’s dismal record in healthcare New research by ‘Lancet’ shows India ranks 154 out of 195 countries in terms of access to healthcare, which is worse than Bangladesh, Nepal, Ghana and Liberia



Popular posts from this blog

Third degree torture used on Maruti workers: Rights body

Haruki Murakami: On seeing the 100% perfect girl one beautiful April morning

Albert Camus's lecture 'The Human Crisis', New York, March 1946. 'No cause justifies the murder of innocents'

The Almond Trees by Albert Camus (1940)

Etel Adnan - To Be In A Time Of War

After the Truth Shower

James Gilligan on Shame, Guilt and Violence