Sophia A. McClennen - An American tragicomedy: The Trump spectacle as a new brand of theater
One of my
favorite clips from the Jon Stewart era of “The Daily Show”
aired on Aug. 23, 2010, in the middle of yet another Fox News
meltdown. The crisis at that time was the debate over the proposed mosque
near Ground Zero. Fox coverage claimed that the man tapped to lead the mosque,
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, was being funneled money by an Islamic extremist. And
in standard Fox News fashion everyone was in a tizzy over this alleged
discovery. Stewart went on to
point out that the same person apparently giving money to the imam, Alwaleed
bin Talal, was also the largest shareholder in Rupert Murdoch’s News
Corporation – a fact that News Corp. subsidiary Fox News seemed to conveniently
overlook, especially since they never actually named him in their segments.
That’s where the fun
begins. Stewart calls in two correspondents, John Oliver and Wyatt Cenac, to
help him understand the Fox News coverage. Is Fox News evil or stupid? Did they
not know that bin Talal was literally one of their owners? Were they just that
stupid, or were they covering it up out of malice? Oliver makes the argument
that they are stupid; Cenac that they are evil.
Of course, the answer is that they are
both. Watch the full clip here.
I’ve often found
myself revisiting that clip now that we are firmly in the Trump era. It can be
so difficult to decide whether to laugh at the sheer stupidity of Trump and his kakistocracy or to cry in horror at their pure evil. That’s when it hit me.
We have focused so much on Trump as a reality TV president living in a Fox
News-fueled alternate universe that we have missed another key part of his
theater: tragicomedy.
Trump’s special brand
of spectacle has a long history, and we need to unpack it if we are going to
figure out how to challenge what he is doing. The genre blending of
tragicomedy has a rich and complex history, dating well back to the ways that
William Shakespeare inserted comic elements in the midst of tragic plays. But
the tragicomedy of Trump is a darker, more modern form of performance.
In its modern version
tragicomedy isn’t a matter of alternating between comedy and tragedy; it is
creating those two reactions at the same time. As Bernard Shaw puts it, it makes “the spectator laugh with
one side of his mouth and cry with the other.” Which is, of course,
why all of our faces hurt these days. The key to the modern
form of tragicomedy is the way it destroys the notion of the hero and the
villain. There is no redemption, no catharsis, no epiphany, and no moral order
— just an endless tension between foreboding and farce. It creates a deep
tension in the spectator — a tension that feels impossible to resolve.
This is why we can
have an inaugural address filled with images of carnage and blood, given by a leader who has taped down his tie and allowed his adviser to be dressed like a toy soldier. This is why a
press secretary can seem both like Groucho Marx and the frightening voice of Orwellian “Newspeak.” This is why
claims of “alt-facts” are both ridiculous and terrifying…
read more: