Pratap Bhanu Mehta - Weaponising faith: The Gyanvapi Mosque-Kashi Vishwanath dispute
There was something incongruous about the moment when I read the news on April 8 that the district court in Varanasi had directed the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct a study of the Gyanvapi Mosque. This day also happened to be Kumar Gandharva’s birth anniversary. It was hard to resist playing his composition in Raga Shankara Sir Pe Dhari Ganga. There is a moment where he adds an extra “gang” before “Ganga”. The resulting “ganga/gagana”, is one of the most incandescent moments in all of Indian music - that extra Ganga literally drenching you in the full freshness and redemptive flow of the Ganga.
It is always tempting to follow this exuberant rendition of Shankara, with another more meditative one - Pandit Jasraj’s Shankara. He sings “Vibhushitanaga Riputammanga”, the penultimate shloka of Panditraja Jagannatha’s Gangalahari. Reading the news of the Gyanvapi order, while these played in the background, almost felt like a defilement, a reminder that the spontaneous and erumpent spirituality of Hinduism was about to be again derailed by sordid politics.
The Gyanvapi order combined with the Supreme Court’s willingness to entertain a plea challenging the Places of Worship Act (Special Provisions), 1991 is going to open another communal front. In the case of the Gyanvapi Mosque, there is no real dispute. It is widely accepted that parts of the Vishwanath temple were destroyed and its walls may have been raised on the plinth of the temple. One also does not have to deny that many Hindus experienced and have a consciousness of Aurungzeb’s reign as being characterised by religious bigotry.
Historians can debate the context and the
motives of Aurangzeb’s actions, and the complexity of his rule. But minimising
the significance of his actions has always been a little historically
incredible and politically disingenuous. If we rest the case for secularism in
contemporary India on establishing Aurangzeb’s liberal credentials, then
secularism will indeed be on rickety foundations. It will also legitimise
Hindutva resting its case on Aurangzeb’s credentials. Secularism will be
deepened if it lets history be history, not make history the foundations of a
secular ethic….
Bharat
Bhushan: Burden of bigotry may break Indian democracy's back
Ashoka University: Correspondence on Professor P. B.
Mehta's Resignation