The politics of vendetta and the abuse of Indian justice. By Manoj Kumar Jha
NB: The Modi government is using the criminal justice system as its centre-forward in a game of political football. One type of (alleged) wrong doing is investigated, while loot and murder (such as in the Vyapam scam) is overlooked. This is scandalous. Are judges and police officials to function as the B-team of the RSS? Officials with a minimum of self-respect should consider if this is what their oath of office implies. These people are undermining the Indian Constitution and destroying the reputation of the Indian Union. DS
The fact that these investigative agencies are cherry-picking their cases – picking up some, ignoring others – is what raises grave doubts about them. The same CBI has maintained a worrying silence over the Vyapam matter, which has witnessed at least 50 unnatural deaths. The agency takes the same posture vis-à-vis the DDCA, where a BJP MP has been raising serious issues of financial embezzle-ment and money laundering involving a top minister in Narendra Modi’s cabinet. This list is getting only longer, what with Lalit Modi and Vijay Mallya, apart from the power tariff scam by private companies perceived to be in proximate corridors of power at the centre.
The politics of
vendetta and witch-hunting got a new avatar on July 7 when the Central Bureau
Investigation (CBI) decided to raid 12 premises of Rashtriya Janata
Dal (RJD) president Lalu Prasad Yadav, his family members and some
other people in pursuance of an 11-year-old issue following an FIR lodged at
Delhi on July 5. The utter haste and
manner in which these raids were conducted underline the paradigm shift in
terms of the standard operating procedures of these agencies, apart from the
fact that the independence of these agencies appear to be under serious doubt.
Under the rule of law it is presumed that law which is administered, and
enforced is accessible, fair, and efficient. It is obvious to anyone that the
nuances of rule of law have been compromised in this case — maybe at the behest
of the whims of those at the helm of affairs.
We need to first
understand the stated “merit” of the case by the CBI director in his press
conference on that day. IRCTC,
which awarded the lease to these hotels owned by the Yadav family, was
constituted by then NDA government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee in
1999; its stated objective was to provide high quality of tourism and catering
services to travellers. Since its formation, IRCTC has awarded leases to more
than 150 food plazas and food parks on the basis of H1 bidder (Technically
Qualified and Highest financial bidder). According to the facts
of this much-sensationalised case by the CBI, IRCTC invited open competitive
bidding tender notice for four ‘Yatri-Niwas’ complexes at Delhi, Kolkata,
Ranchi and Puri in the latter half of 2006. On the basis of established and
prevalent norms i.e. awarding the lease to the highest bidder, the leases were
accordingly awarded.
The present regime,
which has directed the agency to investigate a “quid pro quo” in these awards,
has chosen to ignore the fact that under the same process leases were awarded
to the Tata group and Meghalaya hotels for 15 years at Delhi and Kolkata
respectively. These leases were awarded in December 2006. Whereas, the alleged
transaction of the land to Delite Marketing, owned by Lalu Yadav’s family, took
place in February 2005 on the basis of reasonable and adequate compensation as
per extant circle rate. But the BJP government
at the centre and its new alliance partner, the CBI, have gone in for a
make-believe kind of “quid pro quo” just to tarnish Lalu ji’s image and also to
silence his vocal posture against the right-wing authoritarian regime of BJP
and RSS. The CBI under the new
director, wants us to believe that the sellers of the land in February 2005 had
a divine revelation that two years later, they shall apply for the lease of the
‘Yatri-Niwas’ complexes and eventually become the H1 bidder. It is a mockery of
the interpretation of the rule of law, when under direction from “above,” the
agency choses to ignore the fact that once a policy decision is taken by the
cabinet, routine issues like invitation for tender etc is executed by the
corporation, in this case by IRCTC. They should have acknowledged the
established precedent that the minister does not intervene in such matters,
thereafter. The use of the phrase - quid pro quo and its strange interpretation
is repugnant.
Thus, the rationale
behind these high decibel raids by the CBI is quite apparent. Many people
believe there is a direct correlation between the quantum of opposition against
the BJP/RSS and the actions of investigative agencies against the person or
political outfit opposing. These supposedly “independent” have begun to
“collaborate” with the ruling regime which is making them function like
qasi-political outfits. This signals that things are horribly wrong with the
grand idea of the “rule of law.” The fact that these
investigative agencies are cherry-picking their cases – picking up some,
ignoring others – is what raises grave doubts about them. The same CBI has
maintained a worrying silence over the Vypaam matter, which has witnessed at
least 50 unnatural deaths. The agency takes the same posture vis-à-vis the
DDCA, where a BJP MP has been raising serious issues of financial embezzlement
and money laundering involving a top minister in Narendra Modi’s
cabinet. This list is getting only longer, what with Lalit Modi and Vijay
Mallya, apart from the power tariff scam by private companies perceived to be
in proximate corridors of power at the centre.
The reality is that
the investigation going on against several leaders of the Opposition are
largely based on false and malicious accusations. Many of these cases may not
stand in a court of law. However, it provides certain short-term gains for the
BJP in managing media headlines – the Vipaksh Mein Sab Chor Hain, or, All
Opposition Leaders are Thieves point of view, with the help of some influential
TV channels. In fact, the whisperings of the next target has already begun.
It is an established
fact that whenever the political churning for Opposition unity gets momentum,
the BJP machinery unleashes a campaigng to malign the image of the leaders of
the Opposition. This is how the investigative agencies are being increasingly
seen as a new instrument in the BJP’s politics, under the present leadership.
That is, if you are incapable of dealing with your Opposition through political
vocabulary or programmes, you take the cover of these agencies to malign and
discredit them. Certainly, this might allow for a few moments of glee for a day
or two but it shall destroy the very idea of independence of these agencies
which is intrinsic to the rule of law. The acceptance and
legitimacy being manufactured for this kind of politics of vendetta does not
bode well for our democratic political culture.
See also
Amit Shah and the Toxic Consequences of ‘Clean Chit’ Jurisprudence by Indira Jaising // Yogi Adityanath decides not to sanction the prosecution of Yogi Adityanath
Ajmer blast case: Two including a former RSS worker get life imprisonment
Ajmer blast case: Two including a former RSS worker get life imprisonment
Prajapati encounter case: Gujarat Police inspector Ashish Pandya reinstated in service
Gujarat reinstates another suspended cop after securing bail in Prajapati encounter case
DG Vanzara's letter - Times of India (2013)
Sumana Ramanan - clips of controversial Modi speeches made just after Gujarat riots (2014)
Gujarat reinstates another suspended cop after securing bail in Prajapati encounter case
DG Vanzara's letter - Times of India (2013)
Sumana Ramanan - clips of controversial Modi speeches made just after Gujarat riots (2014)
A letter to Jaitley: Why do students get jailed but RSS leaders who issue vile threats walk freely?
