India Resists Press Statement: On the government's responses to the e-petition against the mischievous R-day advertisement
On behalf of IndiaResists.com, we thank citizens for supporting our petition against the government's mischievous advertisement this 26th January, which omitted 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
We are dismayed by the Information & Broadcasting Ministry's "explanation", published in today's newspapers. It defies credulity to contend that the Preamble amended in 1976 was "not available", and the original, outdated one was used in tribute to the Constitution's framers.
The advertisement didn't have a "retro" theme, but had a contemporary photograph of five women and three men in the foreground, beneath Narendra Modi's prominently displayed quote about the government of India having "only one holy book" and "that is the Constitution".
But the Constitution is emphatically not a "holy book"; it's a secular document. Besides, six of the eight human figures displayed in ceremonial costumes are seemingly Hindu; the remaining two appear to be Northeastern tribals. As many as four of the five women have tikas on their foreheads, identifying them with one religious community.
No Muslim, Sikh or Christian finds a representation in this majoritarian advertisement. This reflects the pro-communal change in perception and attitude driven by the Modi regime with its ideological allegiance to Hindu Rashtra.
Several commentators have noted that even this year's Republic Day parade showcased a very Hinduised picture of many states, and floats of the states ruled by opposition parties were excluded. The tableau on 'Make in India' was reportedly prepared by a US-based public-relations agency.
Our e-petition emphasised that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' were added to the Preamble to reflect the collective will of the Indian people to uphold those values.
We deplore the government's misrepresentation of the spirit of the Constitution and Republic Day, and call upon the people to remain vigilant to distortions of the core-values of our democracy.
We are dismayed by the Information & Broadcasting Ministry's "explanation", published in today's newspapers. It defies credulity to contend that the Preamble amended in 1976 was "not available", and the original, outdated one was used in tribute to the Constitution's framers.
The advertisement didn't have a "retro" theme, but had a contemporary photograph of five women and three men in the foreground, beneath Narendra Modi's prominently displayed quote about the government of India having "only one holy book" and "that is the Constitution".
But the Constitution is emphatically not a "holy book"; it's a secular document. Besides, six of the eight human figures displayed in ceremonial costumes are seemingly Hindu; the remaining two appear to be Northeastern tribals. As many as four of the five women have tikas on their foreheads, identifying them with one religious community.
No Muslim, Sikh or Christian finds a representation in this majoritarian advertisement. This reflects the pro-communal change in perception and attitude driven by the Modi regime with its ideological allegiance to Hindu Rashtra.
Several commentators have noted that even this year's Republic Day parade showcased a very Hinduised picture of many states, and floats of the states ruled by opposition parties were excluded. The tableau on 'Make in India' was reportedly prepared by a US-based public-relations agency.
Our e-petition emphasised that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' were added to the Preamble to reflect the collective will of the Indian people to uphold those values.
We deplore the government's misrepresentation of the spirit of the Constitution and Republic Day, and call upon the people to remain vigilant to distortions of the core-values of our democracy.
Editorial team,
IndiaResists.com
Contact: Kumar Sundaram +91-9810556134
The e-petition, with more than 1350 signatures, can be accessed at
NB: I have signed this petition. However, with regard to the sentence "No Muslim, Sikh or Christian finds a representation in this majoritarian advertisement", I would like to point out that apart from Sikhs wearing turbans, Muslims and Christians do not generally have a uniform appearance that marks them out from anyone else. Therefore pictorial representations of communities tend to take on a farcical and cartoonish aspect. And why should religious only categories be used to depict Indian diversity? How should Naga's, Adivasis and Sikkimese be depicted? DS
