'Truth spoken without moderation reverses itself'
This blog is a source for intellectual exploration. It includes a list of alternative resources and a source of free books. The placement of an article does not imply that I agree with it, merely that I found it thought-provoking. There are also poems and book reviews. Texts written by me are labelled. Readers are free to re-post anything they like.
Tuesday, August 23, 2016
Ajay Singh - Honesty as offence: This Gandhian bureaucrat’s travails expose our criminal justice // Harish Khare: A trial and a travesty
Few would know that former coal secretary
Harish Chandra Gupta’s travails in facing trials on various corruption charges
in a specially designated CBI court and the Supreme Court on the coal scam have
already taken a heavy toll on governance. In many cases, officials have been
refusing clearance to infrastructure projects wherever a situation of
The reason is not far to seek. An
impression is gaining ground among bureaucrats that if an honest officer like
Gupta can be harassed for following laid down procedures, it would be unsafe
for any officer to take any decision at his or her own risk.
Needless to say, there are increasing cases
of officials pushing the files and passing the buck on the political executive
to take discretionary call. Indeed, this is not a happy situation, say
senior officials in the government of India. Yet, the story of Gupta whose
honesty and integrity is vouched for by his seniors and juniors as “impeccable”
is hardly getting any traction in power corridors.
A group of retired IAS officials however,
met Gupta and assured him of providing legal help to overcome his predicament
by pooling in their resources. Why is Gupta’s story different from that of
other bureaucrats arraigned on various corruption charges? To answer this
query, let me share with you some of the interesting details I have gathered
from talking to those who investigated the coal scam right from the beginning.
These details are as follows:
1. The procedure for auctioning the coal
mines was quite opaque. Those allotted mines were picked up randomly on the
basis of assessment of their net worth and their capabilities. In most cases,
the applicants are assessed by junior staff even though the approval for
allocation comes from the secretary heading the panel, which was assigned the
task of monitoring it.
2. Gupta followed the set procedures which
were duly approved by the government.
3. In the course of the CBI investigation,
Gupta denied insinuation of being influenced by any pressure from above
(meaning the political executive). The CBI sleuths asked him multiple times if
he did anything under duress. To this, Gupta replied that he was not under any
pressure and merely followed a laid down procedure. “I will not lie to escape
my responsibility,” he told the investigating sleuths of the CBI.
4. Gupta flatly denied an attempt by the
CBI to turn him into a witness by shifting the blame on the political executive
and finding an alibi. Given the impeccable credentials of Gupta as a
bureaucrat, the CBI made every attempt to convince him to extricate himself by
pinning blames on others. He turned down the offer.
In a brilliantly argued piece in The
Tribune on this issue, noted journalist Harish Khare has pointed out that an
honest officer like him is a collateral damage to the prevailing culture of
accusations which is bound to have deleterious impact on governance.
Though the CBI is aware of Gupta’s honesty
and integrity, he is made accused in 20-odd cases of corruption in allocation
of coal mines. His request to the Supreme Court to club all cases together in
order to avoid harassment was turned down. However, in a similar case, the SC
gave relief to Gupta’s predecessor PC Parakh, and restrained the trial court
from framing the charges.
Like any honest civil servant, Gupta is a
man of limited resources after his retirement. His inability to bear the
expenses of legal help drove him to a situation where he offered the CBI court
to surrender his bail and fight the case from inside the jail.
His logic, of course, is simple: if he is
proven guilty by law, he must not escape the punishment. He referred to his
aging and medical conditions to explain his deeply internalized “Gandhian
traits” to bear all ignominy and incarceration in silence. Unlike the Galahads
of bureaucracy who proclaimed themselves to be the most honest, Gupta who
served as top most civil servant of the government of India, comes across as a
human being extremely vulnerable to a malevolent jurisprudence and polity.
Indeed, he silently exposes a hideous face
of a criminal justice system which is deeply prejudiced against an honest
The chilling news item
was tucked away in an inside page. And not many newspapers had even bothered to
publish the agency copy. But every honest, sincere and dedicated bureaucrat,
serving or retired, must have felt a cold shudder down the spine as s/he read
the news item: a former Coal Secretary, HC Gupta, who has found himself accused
in the so-called coal scam, has told the court that he would rather “face the
trial from inside the jail” than apply for bail. Mr Gupta told the CBI court
that he was unable and unwilling to spare his limited financial resources on hiring
legal counsel. For good measure, he declined the court's offer of legal aid.
Simply put, this fine
bureaucrat, whom everyone unhesitatingly certifies to be “the most honest
officer” of his generation, has refused to cooperate with the judiciary-monitored
sham that bogus righteousness has inflicted on the nation. In very measured
words, Mr Gupta told the court:
“Whatever I did as Chairperson of the Screening
Committee or as Secretary Coal was done with a clear conscience…I also believe
that the coal block allocation was no scam. The Screening Committee did its job
sincerely and in good faith.”
Yet, he finds himself
arrayed as an accused in a number of cases, brought against him by the CBI. An
honest man with the very limited means accruing to an honest official, he is
pitted against the organisational resourcefulness of a premier investigating
agency, infused with a misplaced missionary zeal and bureaucratic clumsiness.
His reputation, character and record stand besmirched: perhaps, a minor
collateral victim in a larger battle. But he refuses to give in to the sordid
logic of “let the law take its own course” bogusness.
“For me, one approach
could be to remain on bail and deal with the case in a normal manner. However,
my conscience tells me not to do so. I am an elderly man suffering from many
diseases. It is quite possible that I may not survive the period of trial
getting completed. I will not like anyone to think that I escaped punishment
because of the time taken in trial.”
Any person with
sensitive nostrils can smell the stench of a Bleak House banality at work in
the so-called investigation and trial in the so-called coal scam. While all the
powerful businessmen and politicians have escaped the CBI dragnet, a man like
HC Gupta has to go through the ordeal of a trial. By refusing to submit to this
dehumanising charade and refusing to feel diminished, Gupta has shamed us all
and made us feel small in our vindictive pursuit of partisan agendas.
Gupta’s ordeal would
be worth it only if we are able to understand the conceit and conspiracies that
were at work five years ago when the country was grandly summoned to the
barricades by that great revolutionary, Anna Hazare. And, feeling noble,
empowered and appropriately angry, we had all responded. The civil society had
experienced its finest and its headiest moment. We were intoxicated with hope
and optimism that we would flush the corrupt down the drain, once and for all.
Nothing of the kind happened, though.
Five years later, the
high priests of that “movement” are performing puja and aarti in different
political temples. The gurus and the babas have become very, very rich
entrepreneurs, the activists have become constitutional functionaries. But, the
old man, Anna, himself has been made to retreat to his village in Maharashtra,
having no voice, no influence, and no constituency.
Five years later, only
the most impressionable would want to believe that India has become
“corruption-free”. It would require considerable gullibility to accept that all
the black money that was deemed to be stashed away in Swiss bank accounts has
been brought back to Mother India. After all that trauma and tantrum five years
ago, we have yet to have a Lokpal. Yet, no one feels agitated, leave alone
cheated. Instead, we have the HC Guptas being subjected to rites of malevolent
Make no mistake: the
HC Gupta episode is bound to have a deleterious impact on all those men and
women who strive to serve the Indian State. As a matter of fact, it was 30
years ago that we injected into our polity and our bureaucratic system a virus
named “Bofors”. Though we felt virtuous and vindicated about the whole affair,
the bottom line is that our defence purchase processes have remained
dangerously skewed. We may have settled a few scores against this or that
political leader or party, but we have ended up inflicting debilitating damage
on our defence forces. No one wants to take a decision; procrastination has
become the first line of defence.
To make matters worse,
we have developed a culture of accusation. It is now almost institutionalised
and we have put in place a plethora of authorised regulators — the CVC, the
CAG, the CBI — to ensure transparency and accountability. Yet, we continue to
have accusations of this or that scandal in defence purchases, spread across
all governments. While nameless middlemen and arms merchants thrive and remain
beyond our reach, we happily accuse officers, in or out of uniform, of
The politicians remain unfazed, but we encourage timidity, caution,
and indecision among our bureaucrats. There is a price to be paid for all this
politics of indignation. If HC Gupta can be subjected to the indignities and
humiliation of a criminal trial, which officer would stick his/her neck out?
As a nation, we remain
hostage to peculiar fancies. Mobs bayed for a powerful Lokpal. The
anti-corruption “movement” five years later should at least cure us of our
infatuation for a foolproof vigilance arrangement. PC Parakh, also a former
Coal Secretary and self-styled crusader against corruption, found himself
subjected to a CBI “raid”. Parakh fancies himself as a kind of whistleblower
and vigorously defends Vinod Rai’s bizarre calculations and conclusions. In a
self-serving book, Crusader or Conspirator? Coalgate and Other Truths, he
prattles: “…a team of dozen (CBI) officers landed at my door to search my flat
eight years after I retired. I did not understand what they expected to find in
my house. Neither did they. While I took it in my stride, my wife was shocked
and traumatised at this reward for 36 years of honest, sincere and dedicated
service.” The policeman could care less for the Parakhs’ sensibilities, just as
he did not give a fig for HC Gupta’s reputation.
The moral of the
story: Mob-induced solutions are rarely anchored in wisdom. All societies have
an awe and fear of the mob and a fascination for the leader who can work the
mob. Mobs produce inherently anti-democratic and authoritarian solutions. As
our democracy takes deeper root, we will need to watch against this danger.