Thursday, April 28, 2016

Uyghur leader Dolkun Isa’s statement on India’s withdrawal of his visa // India denies visa to Tiananmen activist Lu Jinghua

India has withdrawn the visa issued to Uyghur leader Dolkun Isa for attending a conference at Dharamsala scheduled later this month. The government had earlier issued a visa to Isa, inviting Chinese criticism. The Chinese government considers Isa a ‘terrorist’ and also used its influence to get a red notice issued against him by Interpol. Earlier today, Isa released his statement on the controversy which reads as follows.

NB - For all the muscular noises emanating from the 'Sangh parivar' government; these events show their disdain for the courageous struggle of Chinese dissidents; along with their fear of annoying the leaders of the People's Republic of China. Here is a report on Modi's chest-thumping  in 2014: Modi blows hot air at China in a rally in Arunachal . Indian democrats need to learn more about the Chinese people's democratic aspirations and support them whole-heartedly. Didn't the Chinese Communist Part support the Indian revolution in the Naxalite era? - DS

STATEMENT OF UYGHUR LEADER DOLKUN ISA
“As the Executive Committee Chairman of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC), I express my disappointment on Indian authorities’ cancellation of my visa to attend the annual Interethnic Interfaith Leadership Conference taking place in Dharamsala, India, from April 30 to May 1, 2016. This conference remains a vital forum through which ethnic and religious communities in China related areas, as well as statesmen, scholars and activists are able to meet openly to discuss and exchange ideas, promote peaceful dialogue, and reinforce bonds between disparate communities.

India had granted me a tourist e-visa, but it was cancelled after my visit was widely reported in the Indian press. Following numerous reports, Indian authorities then proceeded to rescind the visa on April 23, 2016. I recognize and understand the difficult position that the Indian government found itself, and regrets that my trip has generated such unwarranted controversy.

This is not the first time that I have had faced difficulties in my international travels to advocates Uyghur rights. In September 2009, I was detained briefly and denied entry to South Korea while travelling to attend the World Forum for Democratization in Asia, to which I was an invited guest. China also has regularly attempted to block or interfere with my human rights work at the UN in Geneva, in particular. I also reject any comparison or association to China’s recent veto by the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee of Pakistani militant leader, Mazood Azhar. Such an unjustifiable comparison seeks only to delegitimize my decades of impassioned work as a strictly non-violent campaigner for Uyghur rights.

China’s clear abuse of Interpol’s Red Notice issuance is also concerning. Historically speaking, the Uyghur community has maintained friendly ties with the Indian people. The Indian government hosted our late leader, Isa Yusuf Alptekin and Uyghur refugees after they fled China in 1949. Finally, I would like to thank the Indian people for their determined solidarity and commitment to rights activists like myself who wish to continue to develop and support dialogue among peoples of all faiths and ethnic backgrounds. I remain disappointed with the final decision, but I am hopeful that positive steps may be taken to maintain India’s relationship with the Uyghur community. I therefore wish the conference success and hope that meaningful dialogue will take place between those who have the privileged of participating the upcoming conference.” 

After withdrawing Uighur leader Dolkun Isa’s visa to visit Dharamsala for a conference on April 28, the Indian government on Thursday reportedly denied visa to a well-known Tiananmen activist Lu Jinghua. New Delhi’s move comes days after it withdrew Germany-based Uighur leader Dolkun Isa’s visa to visit Dharamsala for a conference after China raised objections. Isa is branded by China as a ‘terrorist’. 

India’s move to grant the visa was seen as a retaliatory measure after China blocked the listing of Jaish-e-Muhammad chief Masood Azhar as an international terrorist at the UN. While Isa was quick to claim that “Chinese pressure” appeared to be the “main reason” for India cancelling the visa, officials said that the issue fell between two stools, the Home Ministry and the Ministry for External Affairs. The government had earlier issued a visa to Isa, inviting Chinese criticism. The Chinese government considers Isa a ‘terrorist’ and also used its influence to get a red notice issued against him by Interpol. MEA officials distanced themselves from the decision, saying Home was the agency involved and that they were “not kept in the loop”. 

see also