'Truth spoken without moderation reverses itself'
This blog is a source for intellectual exploration. It includes a list of alternative resources and a source of free books. The placement of an article does not imply that I agree with it, merely that I found it thought-provoking. There are also poems and book reviews. Texts written by me are labelled. Readers are free to re-post anything they like.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Shubhajit Roy - 18 sedition cases slapped on Bangladeshi editor
The echoes of JNU’s sedition row
are resonating 1,400 km east of Delhi where a similar charge is being used by
Dhaka’s ruling party and its leaders to harass one of its most respected
editors and a 1971 war veteran who heads the largest English daily in
Mahfuz Anam, editor of
The Daily Star, has been visiting lower courts across Bangladesh since
last week for hearings related to 79 cases filed against him last month by
supporters of Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League — 18 are related to sedition and the
rest to defamation. Speaking to The Sunday Express over telephone from Dhaka,
Anam was careful in his comments on the cases he faced, saying the matter was
Asked about the JNU
row and the situation in his country, he said, “The sedition charge should not
be used at all against students and civil society in a democratic society. This
is part of growing intolerance in South Asia. It is dangerous and sad to me. Appreciation
seems to be going down on the role of dissent and critical voice in a
democratic space… the contestation of ideas is the soul of democracy. That is
being curbed through jingoism, ultra-nationalism or even, religious extremism,”
It was close to
midnight on February 3, when Anam — appearing in a talk show on the eve of The
Daily Star’s 25th anniversary celebrations — referred to a lapse in his
editorial judgment nine years ago. He admitted that publishing some reports in
2007 accusing Sheikh Hasina, then an Opposition leader, of corruption were a
case of “bad editorial judgement”. Later, Sheikh Hasina was arrested and
imprisoned for 11 months.
Anam’s paper was one
of the many publications in Bangladesh that published reports based on
confessional statements extracted by the country’s military intelligence
agency, the Directorate General of Field Intelligence. Some TV channels even
showed recordings of those confessions. But
within 24 hours of Anam’s remarks, Sheikh Hasina’s son Sajeeb Wajed Joy — who
lives in the US and is an advisor to the Bangladesh government — took to
Facebook to call for Anam’s arrest and trial for treason.
Over the 48 hours that
followed, Awami League leaders across Bangladesh filed cases of defamation and
sedition against Anam. For the last 10 days, the 66-year-old has been
travelling to distant towns in Bangladesh to appear before the courts and
obtain bail. On Tuesday, Anam appeared before a court in Magura, 176 kms from
Dhaka, in south-western Bangladesh. This was his third court appearance.
observers in Bangladesh, speaking on condition of anonymity since the matter
was “sub-judice”, said the petitions against Anam do not fulfill two key
conditions of the law. Defamation can only be filed by the person who has been
defamed. In all these cases, Sheikh Hasina has not filed a single petition.
Besides, a rejoinder must first be sent to the paper… a defamation case can be
filed only if that is not published,” said an observer.
“Also, the charge of
“sedition” or allegations of treason can only be invoked by those in the
government at that time. But Sheikh Hasina was not in power in 2007, when the
stories were published. She was the Awami League chief,” the observer said.
Anam’s remarks on the
show also triggered a number of conspiracy theories — about his role in sending
Sheikh Hasina to prison, invoking the infamous “minus-two formula” (a
conspiracy theory in Bangladesh political circles that involved elimination of
Hasina and her main opponent Khaleda Zia), his ambition of launching a
political party with Nobel laureate Mohammad Yunus, his aim of grabbing
political power, etc.
A source close to Anam
denied all the charges. But a few weeks ago, Sheikh Hasina accused The Daily
Star and the group’s Bangla daily, Prothom Alo, of writing against her for the
last 20 years. She also questioned Anam’s integrity. “It does not make sense,”
said sources associated with the newspaper. “The Daily Star has been supporting
the major achievements and positions of the Hasina government. The paper is one
of the strongest voices of secularism in Bangladesh, which is the USP of the
Sheikh Hasina government. It supported the war crimes trial started by the
government. It supported the government’s strong stand against religious
extremism. And it has also supported Dhaka’s plans for regional connectivity,
including its relations with India,” they said.
Those watching the
developments in Bangladesh have privately expressed concern on the situation.
“The country has become a one-party state. There is no Opposition worth its
name. The main Opposition party, the Jatiyo Party led by former President’s
wife Raushan Ershad, has three ministers in the Bangladesh Cabinet. The
situation is bizarre,” said a diplomat.
In such a situation,
an independent newspaper can be the only source of “counter-narrative”, said
sources associated with the newspaper. “The Daily Star has been at the
receiving end of the Sheikh Hasina government. Reporters from the paper were
not allowed to cover the PM’s events for the last few years, and, in recent
months, even Prothom Alo’s reporters were denied access. Top advertisers,
including telecom companies and multi-national companies, were asked by the
ruling establishment to not advertise in the paper. This has led to about 30
per cent reduction of revenues from advertising,” said the sources.
While the editor’s council
in Bangladesh has issued a statement of support, many say that it could have
been “more strong and should be followed up”. For now, Anam believes that The
Daily Star will be able to remain committed to the fundamentals of journalism.
“That is the goal,” he said.